How Can the Zambian Government Improve the Targeting of the Farmer Input Support Program
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Jayne,et al. Fertilizer Subsidies and Smallholder Commercial Fertilizer Purchases: Crowding out, Leakage, and Policy Implications for Zambia , 2013 .
[2] G. Shively,et al. Addressing the “Wicked Problem” of Input Subsidy Programs in Africa , 2013 .
[3] Frank Kreith,et al. Bang for the Buck , 2012 .
[4] N. Sitko,et al. Assessing the Feasibility of Implementing the Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP) Through an Electronic Voucher System in Zambia , 2012 .
[5] W. Burke,et al. Can the FISP More Effectively Achieve Food Production and Poverty Reduction Goals , 2012 .
[6] J. Black,et al. Getting More “Bang for the Buck”: Diversifying Subsidies Beyond Fertilizer and Policy Beyond Subsidies , 2012 .
[7] W. Burke,et al. The 2011 Surplus in Smallholder Maize Production in Zambia: Drivers, Beneficiaries, & Implications for Agricultural & Poverty Reduction Policies , 2011 .
[8] W. Burke,et al. Factors Contributing to Zambia's 2010 Maize Bumper Harvest , 2010 .
[9] A. Gulati,et al. Investment, subsidies, and pro‐poor growth in rural India , 2008 .
[10] A. Dorward,et al. EVALUATION OF THE 2006/7 AGRICULTURAL INPUT SUBSIDY PROGRAMME, MALAWI. FINAL REPORT , 2008 .
[11] Thomas S. Jayne,et al. Do input subsidy programs “crowd in” or “crowd out” commercial market development? Modeling fertilizer demand in a two‐channel marketing system , 2009 .