The Effects of the Odstock Drop Foot Stimulator on Perceived Quality of Life for People With Stroke and Multiple Sclerosis

Introduction. Gait speed is often used as a proxy for gait quality. However, some users of FES devices for correction of dropped foot choose to continue to use the device despite no significant change in speed. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) was used to evaluate the effects of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS) on perceived quality of life (QOL) for people with stroke and multiple sclerosis (MS) and was compared with change in walking speed. Method. A total of 21 people with stroke and 20 with MS completed the PIADS questionnaire after 18 weeks of using the ODFS. Walking speed was recorded more than 10 m with and without stimulation. Results. Both groups recorded positive median scores for all three sections of the PIADS questionnaire: Competence (1.25 stroke, 0.91 MS), Adaptability (1.25 stroke, 0.50 MS), and Self‐esteem (0.88 stroke, 0.75 MS). These were significantly greater for the stroke than the MS group for Competence, p= 0.04 and Adaptability, p= 0.006. There was no significant correlation between changes in PIADS and changes in walking speed. Conclusions. FES for correction of dropped foot has a beneficial effect on perceived QOL for people with stroke and MS but this is not correlated with an objective measures of gait.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Effects of a New Radio Frequency–Controlled Neuroprosthesis on Gait Symmetry and Rhythmicity in Patients with Chronic Hemiparesis , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  P. Taylor,et al.  The clinical use of functional electrical stimulation in neurological rehabilitation , 2004 .

[3]  J. Jutai,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) , 2002 .

[4]  J. Norton,et al.  Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Liberson Wt,et al.  Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of a Footdrop Stimulator Controlled by a Tilt Sensor , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  J W Jutai,et al.  Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  J W Jutai,et al.  Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Norton,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Taylor,et al.  A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis , 2009, Multiple sclerosis.

[11]  M J Scherer,et al.  Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Joaquin Andres Hoffer,et al.  Initial results with fully implanted Neurostep TM FES system for foot drop , 2005 .

[13]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Phase II trial to evaluate the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator in established hemiplegia. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  D. Wood,et al.  The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  D. Hellawell,et al.  Persisting symptoms and carers' views of outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.