Effects of extracochlear direct current stimulation on the ensemble auditory nerve activity of cats

The influence of direct current applied by round window stimulation on the whole nerve response of the auditory nerve of the cat has been studied. Effects on acoustically driven activity (CAP) and on the ensemble spontaneous activity of the nerve were observed. Stimulation with positive current suppressed driven and spontaneous activity. The strength and spread of suppressive effects was a function of the applied current level. After a period of positive electrical stimulation, driven and spontaneous activity rapidly returned to normal values. A rebound effect was sometimes observed, marked by a brief increase in spontaneous activity above the normal level. Negative current initially produced an increase in the amplitude of driven and spontaneous responses. Prolonged stimulation with negative current (greater than 30 s) resulted in a subsequent, graded reduction of neural activity, until a profound suppression of spontaneous and evoked neural activity was attained. The amplitude/latency relationship of CAPs was altered during passing of negative currents but not during passing of positive currents. Recovery from the suppression generated by negative currents was commonly prolonged for anything from a few seconds to many minutes; prolongation was dependent on stimulus amplitude, duration and duty cycles.

[1]  二井 一成,et al.  SISI-TESTの検討:正常値について , 1967 .

[2]  J. W. House,et al.  Tinnitus: surgical treatment. , 1981, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[3]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KC1 solution and by direct currents. , 1952, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Aran Jm Electrical stimulation of the auditory system and tinnitus control. , 1981 .

[5]  N. Kiang,et al.  Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Charles W. Parkins,et al.  Cochlear prostheses: An international symposium , 1983 .

[7]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-Nerve Activity in Cats Exposed to Ototoxic Drugs and High-Intensity Sounds , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  Influence of direct current on dc receptor potentials from cochlear inner hair cells in the guinea pig. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B. Meyer,et al.  Transcutaneous electrotherapy for severe tinnitus. , 1981, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[11]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea‐pig. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Graham,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea using a transtympanic electrode. , 1977, British journal of audiology.

[13]  Brackmann De Reduction of tinnitus in cochlear-implant patients. , 1981, The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement.

[14]  A. Møller,et al.  Pathophysiology of tinnitus. , 1984, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[15]  Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. I. Prolonged direct-current polarization. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. Aran,et al.  Temporary tinnitus suppression in man through electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  Craig C. Bader,et al.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. , 1985, Science.

[18]  D. C. Teas,et al.  Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. II. Interaction of electrical polarization and acoustic stimulation. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the cochlea in man: hearing induction and tinnitus suppression. , 1978, Journal of the American Audiology Society.

[20]  C. E. Schreiner,et al.  Forward masking of the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) and the frequency following response (FFR) , 1985, Hearing Research.

[21]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Ear: Experimental Studies , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[22]  H Feldmann,et al.  Homolateral and contralateral masking of tinnitus by noise-bands and by pure tones. , 1971, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[23]  S. Khanna,et al.  LX The Input Impedance of the Inner Ear in Cats , 1966, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[24]  E. Evans,et al.  Animal models of tinnitus. , 1981, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[25]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Multiple reservoir model of neurotransmitter release by a cochlear inner hair cell. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  E. Evans,et al.  Ototoxic effects of salicylates on the responses of single cochlear nerve fibres and on cochlear potentials. , 1982, British journal of audiology.

[27]  William F. House,et al.  Letters regarding Supplement 38 Entitled , 1977 .

[28]  R. Goodey Drugs in the treatment of tinnitus. , 2008, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[29]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical suppression of tinnitus. , 1981, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[30]  C. E. Schreiner,et al.  The auditory neurophonic: Basic properties , 1984, Hearing Research.