Do all the linear accelerators comply with the ICRU 91's constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments?

Recent technological developments in linear accelerators (linacs) and their imaging systems have made it possible to routinely perform stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments. To ensure the security and quality of the treatments, national and international recommendations have been written. This review focuses on the recommendations of the report 91 of the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) on stereotactic treatments with small photon beams and proposes to answer the question of the eligibility of the commercially available accelerators for the treatment of extra-cranial SRT (SBRT). The ICRU 91 report outlines important features needed to respect the constraints, which are high intensity photon beam, integrated image-guidance, high mechanical accuracy of the linac, multileaf collimator with reduced leaf width, bundled motion management and bundled 6 Dimensional "robotic" couch tabletop. Most of the contemporary linacs meet these recommendations, in particular, stereotactic dedicated linacs, or modern gantry-based linacs equipped with 3 dimensional cone-beam CT imaging and 2D-stereoscopic planar imaging. Commercially available ring-based linacs have some limitations: they offer only coplanar treatments, and couch movements are limited to translations and, some have limited imaging equipment and no ability to manage intrafraction motion. However, for performing SBRT, non-coplanar irradiations are not mandatory, contrarily to intracranial stereotactic irradiations. Furthermore, patients' rotations can be corrected, thanks to real-time adaptive radiotherapy available on MRI-linacs. Finally, significant improvements are expected in the short term to compensate the weaknesses of the current devices.

[1]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Feasibility of real‐time motion management with helical tomotherapy , 2018, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[2]  N Suchowerska,et al.  Small field dosimetric characterization of a new 160-leaf MLC. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  H. Kim,et al.  Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABR , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[4]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Oliver Blanck,et al.  ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams , 2019, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[6]  Michael Lock,et al.  Clinical Implementation of Adaptive Helical Tomotherapy: A Unique Approach to Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy , 2006, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[7]  L. Livi,et al.  CyberKnife MLC-based treatment planning for abdominal and pelvic SBRT: Analysis of multiple dosimetric parameters, overall scoring index and clinical scoring. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  J. Régis,et al.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cervical spine lesions: expanding the indications in the new era of Icon , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  S Pencea,et al.  Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy of head-and-neck cancer on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: Plan quality and delivery time comparison with a C-arm linac. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Jennifer B. Smilowitz,et al.  Long‐term dosimetric stability of multiple TomoTherapy delivery systems , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  E. Podgoršak,et al.  Physical aspects of dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1987, Applied neurophysiology.

[13]  J Debus,et al.  MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[14]  Steven D Chang,et al.  A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CYBERKNIFE SPINAL RADIOSURGERY USING SKELETAL STRUCTURE TRACKING , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[15]  L. Leksell,et al.  Cerebral radiosurgery. I. Gammathalanotomy in two cases of intractable pain. , 1968, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[16]  T Solberg,et al.  Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi-institutional study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[17]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[18]  F Colombo,et al.  External stereotactic irradiation by linear accelerator. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[20]  M J Murphy,et al.  The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. , 1997, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.