What drives the spatial agency bias? An Italian-Malagasy-Arabic comparison study.

In Western cultures, human interactions are generally envisaged such that the agent appears on the left, the recipient on the right, with action flowing from left to right. Here we explore the joint influence of 2 mechanisms driving such spatial asymmetries: the embodiment of script direction and the order in which subject and object are mentioned. A comparison of 3 language communities (Italian, Malagasy, Arabic) differing in script direction (left-right for Italian and Malagasy and right-left for Arabic) and in subject-object order (subject-verb-object in Italian and Arabic and verb-object-subject in Malagasy) provides evidence for the assumption that both mechanisms contribute to the spatial asymmetry.

[1]  S. Wapner,et al.  The influence of lateral organization on the evaluation of paintings. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[2]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Perceptual Bias for Forward-Facing Motion , 1992 .

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[6]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  S. Chokron,et al.  Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  Anne Maass,et al.  Directional Bias in the Mental Representation of Spatial Events , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  Thomas M. Spalek,et al.  The Left-to-Right Bias in Inhibition of Return Is Due to the Direction of Reading , 2005, Psychological science.

[10]  Anne Maass,et al.  How Beautiful is the Goal and How Violent is the Fistfight? Spatial Bias in the Interpretation of Human Behavior , 2007 .

[11]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Marc Ouellet,et al.  Is the future the right time? , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[13]  Orly Fuhrman,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Cognitive systems struggling for word order , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  A. Maass,et al.  Writing Direction, Agency and Gender Stereotyping: An Embodied Connection , 2011 .

[16]  Zohreh R. Eslami,et al.  Script Directionality Affects Depiction of Depth in Representational Drawings , 2011 .

[17]  M. Zorzi,et al.  When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  Michael Meeuwis,et al.  Order of subject, object, and verb , 2013 .