Spatial scaling of extinction rates: Theory and data reveal nonlinearity and a major upscaling and downscaling challenge

Aim Biodiversity loss is a key component of biodiversity change and can impact ecosystem services. However, estimation of the loss has focused mostly on per-species extinction rates measured over a limited number of spatial scales, with little theory linking small-scale extirpations to global extinctions. Here, we provide such a link by introducing the relationship between area and the number of extinctions (number of extinctions–area relationship; NxAR) and between area and the proportion of extinct species (proportion of extinctions–area relationship; PxAR). Unlike static patterns, such as the species–area relationship, NxAR and PxAR represent spatial scaling of a dynamic process. We show theoretical and empirical forms of these relationships and we discuss their role in perception and estimation of the current extinction crisis. Location U.S.A., Europe, Czech Republic and Barro Colorado Island (Panama). Time period 1500–2009. Major taxa studied Vascular plants, birds, butterflies and trees. Methods We derived the expected forms of NxAR and PxAR from several theoretical frameworks, including the theory of island biogeography, neutral models and species–area relationships. We constructed NxAR and PxAR from five empirical datasets collected over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Results Although increasing PxAR is theoretically possible, empirical data generally support a decreasing PxAR; the proportion of extinct species decreases with area. In contrast, both theory and data revealed complex relationships between numbers of extinctions and area (NxAR), including nonlinear, unimodal and U-shaped relationships, depending on region, taxon and temporal scale. Main conclusions The wealth of forms of NxAR and PxAR explains why biodiversity change appears scale dependent. Furthermore, the complex scale dependence of NxAR and PxAR means that global extinctions indicate little about local extirpations, and vice versa. Hence, effort should be made to understand and report extinction rates as a scale-dependent problem. In this effort, estimation of scaling relationships such as NxAR and PxAR should be central.

[1]  H. Pereira,et al.  Comparing Extinction Rates: Past, Present, and Future , 2013 .

[2]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss , 2011, Nature.

[3]  William E. Kunin,et al.  Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts : Implications for reserve design , 1997 .

[4]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[5]  F. Hartig,et al.  Mechanistic simulation models in macroecology and biogeography: state‐of‐art and prospects , 2017 .

[6]  H. Pereira,et al.  Improving extinction projections across scales and habitats using the countryside species-area relationship , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Neutral theory as a predictor of avifaunal extinctions after habitat loss , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Modeling biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes. , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction , 2015, Science Advances.

[10]  M. Foote Temporal variation in extinction risk and temporal scaling of extinction metrics , 1994, Paleobiology.

[11]  R. Ricklefs The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? , 2006, Ecology.

[12]  C. Marshall,et al.  Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? , 2011, Nature.

[13]  S. Scheiner Six types of species‐area curves , 2003 .

[14]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Estimating local biodiversity change: a critique of papers claiming no net loss of local diversity. , 2016, Ecology.

[15]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[16]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[17]  H. Dürr,et al.  A scenario for impacts of water availability loss due to climate change on riverine fish extinction rates , 2013 .

[18]  J. Alroy Accurate and precise estimates of origination and extinction rates , 2014, Paleobiology.

[19]  H. Bauer,et al.  The size of savannah Africa: a lion’s (Panthera leo) view , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[21]  M. Konvička,et al.  How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold , 2008, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[22]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Extinction in Subdivided Habitats , 1987 .

[23]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Downscaling of species distribution models: a hierarchical approach , 2013 .

[24]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Light-Gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest , 1999, Science.

[25]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[26]  W. Jetz,et al.  Downscaling the environmental associations and spatial patterns of species richness. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  A. Magurran,et al.  Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[29]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[30]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[31]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales , 2017, Nature.

[32]  Richard Condit,et al.  Tropical Forest Census Plots , 1998, Environmental Intelligence Unit.

[33]  D. Wake,et al.  Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  W. Jetz,et al.  On the decline of biodiversity due to area loss , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[39]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Fine‐scale environmental variation in species distribution modelling: regression dilution, latent variables and neighbourly advice , 2011 .

[40]  B. Hugueny,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and extinction rates within freshwater fish communities: a faunal relaxation approach , 2011 .

[41]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity , 2001 .

[42]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics , 2012 .

[43]  J. Harte,et al.  Beyond the species–area relationship: improving macroecological extinction estimates , 2014 .

[44]  William E. Kunin,et al.  Scale Dependency of Rarity, Extinction Risk, and Conservation Priority , 2003 .

[45]  Henrique M. Pereira,et al.  Global Biodiversity Change: The Bad, the Good, and the Unknown , 2012 .

[46]  P. Raven,et al.  Biodiversity: Extinction by numbers , 2000, Nature.

[47]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  What ' s on the horizon for macroecology? , 2012 .

[48]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  S. Jackson,et al.  Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  Stephen J Cornell,et al.  Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[51]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Thirty Years of Forest Census at Barro Colorado and the Importance of Immigration in Maintaining Diversity , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  J. Alroy Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Peter Raven,et al.  Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Lander Baeten,et al.  Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Richard Fox,et al.  Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change , 2004, Nature.

[57]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss , 2018 .