Using DNA Microarrays To Identify Library-Independent Markers for Bacterial Source Tracking

ABSTRACT Bacterial source tracking is used to apportion fecal pollution among putative sources. Within this context, library-independent markers are genetic or phenotypic traits that can be used to identify the host origin without a need for library-dependent classification functions. The objective of this project was to use mixed-genome Enterococcus microarrays to identify library-independent markers. Separate shotgun libraries were prepared for five host groups (cow, dog, elk/deer, human, and waterfowl), using genomic DNAs (gDNAs) from ca. 50 Enterococcus isolates for each library. Microarrays were constructed (864 probes per library), and 385 comparative genomic hybridizations were used to identify putative markers. PCR assays were used to screen 95 markers against gDNAs from isolates from known sources collected throughout the United States. This validation process narrowed the selection to 15 markers, with 7 having no recognized homologues and the remaining markers being related to genes involved in metabolic pathways and DNA replication. In most cases, each marker was exclusive to one of four Enterococcus species (Enterococcus casseliflavus, E. faecalis, E. hirae, or E. mundtii). Eight markers were highly specific to either cattle, humans, or elk/deer, while the remaining seven markers were positive for various combinations of hosts other than humans. Based on microarray hybridization data, the prevalence of host-specific markers ranged from 2% to 45% of isolates collected from their respective hosts. A 20-fold difference in prevalence could present challenges for the interpretation of library-independent markers.

[1]  Joan B. Rose,et al.  Microbial Source Tracking: Current Methodology and Future Directions , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  J. Rose,et al.  Geographical Variation in Ribotype Profiles of Escherichia coli Isolates from Humans, Swine, Poultry, Beef, and Dairy Cattle in Florida , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  Donald E. Thompson,et al.  PCR detection of specific pathogens in water: a risk-based analysis. , 2002, Environmental Science and Technology.

[4]  J. Rose,et al.  Potential use of a host associated molecular marker in Enterococcus faecium as an index of human fecal pollution. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  P. Hartel,et al.  Potential of Enterococcus faecalis as a human fecal indicator for microbial source tracking. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[6]  D. Call,et al.  Combining Suppression Subtractive Hybridization and Microarrays To Map the Intraspecies Phylogeny of Flavobacteriumpsychrophilum , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[7]  R. B. Reneau,et al.  Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[8]  D. Call,et al.  Simultaneous Discrimination between 15 Fish Pathogens by Using 16S Ribosomal DNA PCR and DNA Microarrays , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Roland Brousseau,et al.  Molecular Biology and DNA Microarray Technology for Microbial Quality Monitoring of Water , 2004, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[10]  J. M. Simpson,et al.  Microbial source tracking: state of the science. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Sunny C. Jiang,et al.  Recommendations for microbial source tracking: lessons from a methods comparison study. , 2003, Journal of water and health.

[12]  A. Mazumder,et al.  Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  M. Ellersieck,et al.  Identification of Fecal Escherichia colifrom Humans and Animals by Ribotyping , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  E. Topp,et al.  A comparison of AFLP and ERIC-PCR analyses for discriminating Escherichia coli from cattle, pig and human sources. , 2004, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[15]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking. , 2003, Journal of water and health.

[16]  Katharine G. Field,et al.  A PCR Assay To Discriminate Human and Ruminant Feces on the Basis of Host Differences in Bacteroides-Prevotella Genes Encoding 16S rRNA , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  R. B. Reneau,et al.  Antibiotic resistance profiles to determine sources of fecal contamination in a rural Virginia watershed. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[18]  M. Brown,et al.  Sample Size, Library Composition, and Genotypic Diversity among Natural Populations of Escherichia coli from Different Animals Influence Accuracy of Determining Sources of Fecal Pollution , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  V. Harwood,et al.  Classification of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Indicator Bacteria by Discriminant Analysis: Use in Predicting the Source of Fecal Contamination in Subtropical Waters , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  Katharine G. Field,et al.  Identification of Nonpoint Sources of Fecal Pollution in Coastal Waters by Using Host-Specific 16S Ribosomal DNA Genetic Markers from Fecal Anaerobes , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  P. Hartel,et al.  Geographic variability of Escherichia coli ribotypes from animals in Idaho and Georgia. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[22]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Numbers of Fecal Bacteroidetes by Use of a Quantitative PCR Assay for 16S rRNA Genes , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  Michael J. Noto,et al.  Use of Antibiotic Resistance Analysis for Representativeness Testing of Multiwatershed Libraries , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  R. B. Reneau,et al.  Determining Sources of Fecal Pollution in a Rural Virginia Watershed with Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Fecal Streptococci , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  Jianwen Fang,et al.  Sequence-based source tracking of Escherichia coli based on genetic diversity of beta-glucuronidase. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[26]  D. Call,et al.  Identifying Antimicrobial Resistance Genes with DNA Microarrays , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[27]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  Michael J. Sadowsky,et al.  Use of Repetitive DNA Sequences and the PCR To DifferentiateEscherichia coli Isolates from Human and Animal Sources , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  R. A. Conway,et al.  Use of Antibiotic Resistance Analysis To Identify Nonpoint Sources of Fecal Pollution , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  Bruce A Wiggins,et al.  Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Thomas E. Besser,et al.  Mixed-Genome Microarrays Reveal Multiple Serotype and Lineage-Specific Differences among Strains of Listeria monocytogenes , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.