More Than Just Free Content

This study explores file sharers' reported motivations for downloading and uploading content on peer-to-peer networks, including ethical obligations guiding file sharing. Drawing on Lessig's classification of purposes of file sharing and Giesler's theoretical framework of gifting systems, 40 in-depth interviews were conducted with file sharers in Singapore using a standard protocol, then transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Downloading is perceived as an alternative through which users satisfy desires that existing markets do not meet. Respondents reported downloading to avoid long waits for content to arrive in Singapore; to access difficult-to-find and censored content; to sample content, including content outside their usual tastes; and because downloading is convenient and free. Respondents reported a norm of reciprocity and sense of community that motivated them to upload and an obligation to purchase content they liked. Implications for understanding and combating file sharing during the inevitable transition to other business models are discussed.

[1]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[2]  Andres Guadamuz,et al.  The New Sharing Ethic in Cyberspace , 2005 .

[3]  Lior Strahilevitz,et al.  Charismatic Code, Social Norms, and the Emergence of Cooperation on the File-Swapping Networks , 2003 .

[4]  Felix Oberholzer-Gee,et al.  The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  M. Giesler,et al.  The Anthropology of File Sharing: Consuming Napster As a Gift , 2003 .

[6]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Dynamics of Illegal Participation in Peer-to-Peer Networks—Why Do People Illegally Share Media Files? , 2006 .

[7]  M. Mauss.  The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies , 1925 .

[8]  Hector Postigo.  From Pong to Planet Quake: Post-Industrial Transitions from Leisure to Work , 2003 .

[9]  Nazareno Andrade,et al.  Gifting technologies: A BitTorrent case study , 2006, First Monday.

[10]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity , 2004 .

[11]  Zeynep Erdeniz.  International Herald Tribune , 2007 .

[12]  Aafke Komter,et al.  Gifts and Social Relations , 2007 .

[13]  Rong-An Shang,et al.  Ethical Decisions About Sharing Music Files in the P2P Environment , 2008 .

[14]  N. Dyer-Witheford,et al.  Playing on the digital commons: collectivities, capital and contestation in videogame culture , 2007 .

[15]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[16]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[17]  Joost Raessens,et al.  2. Computer Games as Participatory Media Culture , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[18]  M. Giesler.  Consumer Gift Systems , 2006 .

[19]  Rahul Telang,et al.  The Effect of P2p File Sharing on Music Markets: A Survival Analysis of Albums on Ranking Charts , 2005 .

[20]  Shujen Wang,et al.  Framing Piracy: Globalization and Film Distribution in Greater China , 2003 .

[21]  Jörgen Skågeby,et al.  Gifting technologies , 2004, First Monday.

[22]  Janice Denegri-Knott,et al.  Sinking the Online ?Music Pirates: ? Foucault, Power and Deviance on the Web , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Lakshmish Ramaswamy,et al.  Free riding: a new challenge to peer-to-peer file sharing systems , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[24]  Richard Barbrook,et al.  The Hi-Tech Gift Economy , 1998, First Monday.

[25]  Stuart P. Seidel.  United States–Singapore Free Trade Agreement , 2003 .