AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

This article describes basic radiation dose concepts as well as those specifically developed to describe the radiation dose from computed tomography (CT). Basic concepts of radiation dose are reviewed, including exposure, absorbed dose, and effective dose. Radiation dose from CT demonstrates variations within the scan plane and along the z axis because of its unique geometry and usage. Several CT-specific dose descriptors have been developed: the Multiple Scan Average Dose descriptor, the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) and its variations (CTDI(100), CTDI(w), CTDI(vol)), and the dose-length product. Factors that affect radiation dose from CT include the beam energy, tube current-time product, pitch, collimation, patient size, and dose reduction options. Methods of reducing the radiation dose to a patient from CT include reducing the milliampere-seconds value, increasing the pitch, varying the milliampere-seconds value according to patient size, and reducing the beam energy. The effective dose from CT can be estimated by using Monte Carlo methods to simulate CT of a mathematical patient model, by estimating the energy imparted to the body region being scanned, or by using conversion factors for general anatomic regions. Issues related to radiation dose from CT are being addressed by the Society for Pediatric Radiology, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, the American College of Radiology, and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the Food and Drug Administration.

[1]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging , 1999, Pediatric Radiology.

[2]  W. Huda,et al.  CT doses in cylindrical phantoms. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  Timothy D. Solberg,et al.  Radiation dose in Spiral CT: The relative effects of collimation and pitch , 1999 .

[5]  J. Ravenel The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed. , 2003 .

[6]  S. Edyvean,et al.  CT scanner dosimetry. , 1998, British Journal of Radiology.

[7]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Normalised Organ Doses for X Ray Computed Tomography Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques and a Mathematical Anthropomorphic Phantom , 1993 .

[8]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  B. Wall,et al.  Reference Doses for Paediatric Computed Tomography , 2000 .

[10]  M Mahesh,et al.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. , 1999, Medical physics.

[12]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  B. Wall,et al.  Survey of CT practice in the UK. Pt. 2 , 1991 .

[14]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques , 1991 .

[15]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  W. Huda,et al.  Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography , 2002 .

[17]  W Panzer,et al.  Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[18]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[19]  W. Huda,et al.  Radiation doses to infants and adults undergoing head CT examinations. , 2001, Medical physics.

[20]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[21]  Robert A. Jucius,et al.  Radiation Dosimetry In Computed Tomography (CT) , 1977, Other Conferences.

[22]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  J. V. Atherton,et al.  Energy imparted and effective doses in computed tomography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[24]  J. Strzelczyk The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003 .

[25]  W Huda,et al.  Energy imparted in computed tomography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[26]  W Huda,et al.  Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  D. Feigal,et al.  FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. , 2002, International journal of trauma nursing.

[30]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. , 1999, Radiology.

[31]  R. Gagne,et al.  A METHOD FOR DESCRIBING THE DOSES DELIVERED BY TRANSMISSION X‐RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 1981, Medical physics.

[32]  Holger Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers , 1999, European Radiology.

[33]  I. Kamel,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis. , 1994, Radiology.