Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance

Daylighting is a passive strategy which is significant in increasing the liveliness, performance, and visual comfort of the residents. It helps to reduce the overall electrical energy consumption of a building. The absorbed radiation by the facade and building interior varies depending on different factors including the sky, environmental barriers, vegetation and position of the sun. The urban environmental factors are fairly effective in creating an appropriate visual space while reducing the energy consumption of a building. This paper aims to review the relevant literature including the basic concepts of daylighting, sky types, movement of the sun and effective architectural parameters in an urban context. The importance of these factors regarding daylight absorption by the facade and interior part of a building, visual comfort and energy efficiency are discussed thoroughly. The concluded results indicate that these factors are of high significance and their impact on the amount of daylight and energy consumption is undeniable. Based on the geometry of urban canyons (height to width ratio of a street), by increasing the street width, the amount of radiation reaching urban canyons significantly increases whereas the energy consumption reduces. In addition, by increasing reflectivity coefficient of materials in exterior surfaces of horizontal and vertical directions, the amount of daylight reaching the interior portions of a building is increased and the need for artificial lighting is consequently reduced. Exterior shading devices also provide visual comfort and decrease the energy consumption of a building. The amount of radiation (daylight) shone into a building is considered an energy saving option, which depends on the region climate. However, a street orientation might cause an uneven distribution of the general radiation on surfaces of the urban canyons.

[1]  Martin Tenpierik,et al.  Review of the impact of urban block form on thermal performance, solar access and ventilation , 2014 .

[2]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Evaluation of energy supply and demand in solar neighborhood , 2012 .

[3]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  URBAN DAYLIGHT SIMULATION CALCULATING THE DAYLIT AREA OF URBAN DESIGNS , 2012 .

[4]  G. Treloar,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study , 2000 .

[5]  Robert Clear,et al.  Discomfort glare: What do we actually know? , 2013 .

[6]  Frank Sharp,et al.  The use and environmental impact of daylighting , 2014 .

[7]  Rafael Serra Florensa,et al.  Re-interpretation of traditional architecture for visual comfort , 2009 .

[8]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting , 2005 .

[9]  Karol Myszkowski,et al.  Rendering Pearlescent Appearance Based On Paint‐Composition Modelling , 2001, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[10]  A. Okeil A holistic approach to energy efficient building forms , 2010 .

[11]  Cheng Tian,et al.  Experimental and simulating examination of computer tools, Radlink and DOE2, for daylighting and energy simulation with venetian blinds , 2014 .

[12]  Myoung Souk Yeo,et al.  Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings , 2010 .

[13]  Minoru Mizuno,et al.  Transition to a sustainable urban energy system from a long-term perspective: Case study in a Japanese business district , 2007 .

[14]  A. Pérez-Burgos,et al.  Daylight illuminance on horizontal and vertical surfaces for clear skies. Case study of shaded surfaces , 2010 .

[15]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications , 2010 .

[16]  Juan J. Sendra,et al.  Lighting design in courtyards: Predictive method of daylight factors under overcast sky conditions , 2014 .

[17]  Michela Buzzetti,et al.  Energy Saving Through the Sun: Analysis of Visual Comfort and Energy Consumption in Office Space☆ , 2012 .

[18]  Giorgia Nardini,et al.  An experimental and numerical analysis of daylighting performance for an office building , 2012 .

[19]  M. E. Esch,et al.  The effects of urban and building design parameters on solar access to the urban canyon and the potential for direct passive solar heating strategies , 2012 .

[20]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Sky view factors in forest canopies calculated with IDRISI , 2001 .

[21]  Sura Al-Maiyah,et al.  The role of daylight in preserving identities in heritage context , 2005 .

[22]  H. D. Cheung,et al.  A study on subjective preference to daylit residential indoor environment using conjoint analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review , 2006 .

[24]  Stoyanka Marinova Ivanova,et al.  Estimation of background diffuse irradiance on orthogonal surfaces under partially obstructed anisotropic sky. Part I - Vertical surfaces , 2013 .

[25]  Kyle Konis,et al.  Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California , 2013 .

[26]  Lawrence R. Siegel,et al.  Multiwavelength Scophony infrared scene projector , 1990, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[27]  P. Torcellini,et al.  A Literature Review of the Effects of Natural Light on Building Occupants , 2002 .

[28]  Daniel Vázquez-Moliní,et al.  Horizontal daylighting system for office buildings , 2013 .

[29]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Simple and Low-Cost Method of Planning for Tree Growth and Lifetime Effects on Solar Photovoltaic Systems Performance , 2013 .

[30]  Fernando Oscar Ruttkay Pereira,et al.  Using artificial neural networks to predict the impact of daylighting on building final electric energy requirements , 2013 .

[31]  E. Andreou,et al.  The effect of urban layout, street geometry and orientation on shading conditions in urban canyons in the Mediterranean , 2014 .

[32]  Yukio Akashi,et al.  Unified Glare Rating (UGR) and subjective appraisal of discomfort glare , 1996 .

[33]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Perceived outdoor lighting quality POLQ. A lighting assessment tool , 2014 .

[34]  Joseph C. Lam An analysis of residential sector energy use in Hong Kong , 1996 .

[35]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  An analysis of daylighting performance for office buildings in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[36]  Robert Hausler,et al.  An emergy analysis for urban environmental sustainability assessment, the Island of Montreal, Canada , 2013 .

[37]  R. Compagnon Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric , 2004 .

[38]  M. Newborough,et al.  An approach for estimating the carbon emissions associated with office lighting with a daylight contribution , 2007 .

[39]  Francis Miguet A FURTHER STEP IN ENVIRONMENT AND BIOCLIMATIC ANALYSIS: THE SOFTWARE TOOL SOLENE , 2007 .

[40]  Vittorio Ferraro,et al.  Calculating indoor natural illuminance in overcast sky conditions , 2010 .

[41]  Ann R. Webb,et al.  Using urban canyon geometries obtained from Google Street View for atmospheric studies: Potential applications in the calculation of street level total shortwave irradiances , 2015 .

[42]  Daniel Chemisana,et al.  Solar radiation manipulations and their role in greenhouse claddings: Fluorescent solar concentrators, photoselective and other materials , 2013 .

[43]  Jian Yao,et al.  An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements , 2014 .

[44]  Laura Bellia,et al.  APPLICATION OF VIDEOPHOTOMETER IN THE EVALUATION OF DGI IN SCHOLASTIC ENVIRONMENT , 2005 .

[45]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  Modelling "non-visual" effects of daylighting in a residential environment , 2013 .

[46]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[47]  Adam Menter Autodesk Sustainability Workshop: Advancing the practice of sustainable engineering through education , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[48]  Mohamed Boubekri,et al.  An Examination of Visual Comfort in Transitional Spaces , 2007 .

[49]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Sunscapes: 'Solar envelopes' and the analysis of urban DEMs , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[50]  Peter Andreas Sattrup,et al.  The urban canyon and building energy use: Urban density versus daylight and passive solar gains , 2011 .

[51]  P. Littlefair Passive solar urban design: ensuring the penetration of solar energy into the city , 1998 .

[52]  J. Michalsky,et al.  All-weather model for sky luminance distribution—Preliminary configuration and validation , 1993 .

[53]  Gautam S. Dutt Illumination and sustainable development. Part I: Technology and economics , 1994 .

[54]  Servando Álvarez Domínguez,et al.  Solar radiation calculation methodology for building exterior surfaces , 2005 .

[55]  Juan J. Sendra,et al.  Daylighting design with lightscoop skylights: Towards an optimization of shape under overcast sky conditions , 2013 .

[56]  Jacques Teller,et al.  Townscope II—A computer system to support solar access decision-making , 2001 .

[57]  Siân Kleindienst,et al.  Interactive expert support for early stage full-year daylighting design: a user’s perspective on Lightsolve , 2013 .

[58]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors , 2006 .

[59]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  A New Technique for Computer Simulation of Illuminated Spaces , 1988 .

[60]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Determination of vertical daylight illuminance under non-overcast sky conditions , 2010 .

[61]  D. Lang,et al.  A systematic review of guiding principles for sustainable urban neighborhood development , 2013 .

[62]  L. Roche,et al.  Occupant reactions to daylight in offices , 2000 .

[63]  É. Correa,et al.  An approach to urban tree daylight permeability simulation using models based on louvers , 2014 .

[64]  D. F. Swinehart,et al.  The Beer-Lambert Law , 1962 .

[65]  Miguel Brito,et al.  Modelling solar potential in the urban environment: State-of-the-art review , 2015 .

[66]  J. Byrne,et al.  A review of the solar city concept and methods to assess rooftop solar electric potential, with an illustrative application to the city of Seoul , 2015 .

[67]  S. Chirarattananon,et al.  Daylight availability and models for global and diffuse horizontal illuminance and irradiance for Bangkok , 2002 .

[68]  Rahul V. Ralegaonkar,et al.  Review of intelligent building construction: A passive solar architecture approach , 2010 .

[69]  Monika Janda,et al.  In Vitro Model of Vitamin D Synthesis by UV Radiation in an Australian Urban Environment , 2011, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[70]  Philipp Weihs,et al.  UV Exposition During Typical Lifestyle Behavior in an Urban Environment , 2010, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[71]  Naoki Matsubara,et al.  Enhanced conduction-corrected modified effective temperature as the outdoor thermal environment evaluation index upon the human body , 2011 .

[72]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but ... , 2009 .

[73]  K. Steemers,et al.  Solar energy and urban morphology: Scenarios for increasing the renewable energy potential of neighbourhoods in London , 2015 .

[74]  Martin Zerta,et al.  Alternative World Energy Outlook (AWEO) and the role of hydrogen in a changing energy landscape , 2008 .

[75]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Measurement of total and spectral solar irradiance: Overview of existing research , 2011 .

[76]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Experimental and Simulation Study on the Performance of Daylighting in an Industrial Building and its Energy Saving Potential , 2014 .

[77]  M Fontoynont,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE MODEL OF LUMINANCE, CORRELATED COLOUR TEMPERATURE AND SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION OF SKYLIGHT: COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1999 .

[78]  Ralph L Knowles,et al.  The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings , 2003 .

[79]  Edna Shaviv,et al.  On the use of ‘solar volume’ for determining the urban fabric , 2001 .

[80]  A. G. Worthing On the Deviation from Lambert's Cosine Law of the Emission from Tungsten and Carbon at Glowing Temperatures , 1912 .

[81]  Lai Choo Malone-Lee,et al.  Evaluating environmental implications of density: A comparative case study on the relationship between density, urban block typology and sky exposure , 2012 .

[82]  Yuehong Su,et al.  Application of RELUX simulation to investigate energy saving potential from daylighting in a new educational building in UK , 2014 .

[83]  J. Teller,et al.  Thermal characterisation of urban fabrics using GIS and Townscope modelling tool , 2006 .

[84]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[85]  Appu Haapio,et al.  Towards sustainable urban communities , 2012 .

[86]  Xiaoxiao Wang,et al.  Blue Star: The proposed energy efficient tall building in Chicago and vertical city strategies , 2015 .

[87]  D. Li,et al.  Identifying CIE standard skies using vertical sky component , 2011 .

[88]  Gabriele Lobaccaro,et al.  Solar Energy in Urban Environment: How Urban Densification Affects Existing Buildings☆ , 2014 .

[89]  P. Greenup,et al.  Daylighting in the tropics , 2002 .

[90]  Jens Christoffersen,et al.  Daylight calculations in practice: An investigation of the ability of nine daylight simulation programs to calculate the daylight factor in five typical rooms , 2013 .

[91]  Paul J. Littlefair,et al.  Daylight, sunlight and solar gain in the urban environment , 2001 .

[92]  R. D. Berry,et al.  Solar envelope concepts: moderate density building applications. Final report , 1980 .

[93]  Zulkhairi Zainol Abidin,et al.  The availability of daylight from tropical skies: a case study of Malaysia , 2002 .

[94]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Daylighting—Light, form, and people , 2006 .

[95]  Karam M. Al-Obaidi,et al.  A study of the impact of environmental loads that penetrate a passive skylight roofing system in Malaysian buildings , 2014 .

[96]  S. Shen,et al.  Influence of sky view factor on outdoor thermal environment and physiological equivalent temperature , 2015, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[97]  Ammar Bouchair,et al.  Cylindrical projection improved formulation for sunshine assessment in buildings , 2012 .

[98]  Ann R. Webb,et al.  Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light , 2006 .

[99]  A. Moret Rodrigues,et al.  Solar and visible optical properties of glazing systems with venetian blinds: Numerical, experimental and blind control study , 2014 .

[100]  Francis Miguet,et al.  A daylight simulation tool for urban and architectural spaces—application to transmitted direct and diffuse light through glazing , 2002 .

[101]  A. Jovanović,et al.  Importance of building orientation in determining daylighting quality in student dorm rooms: Physical and simulated daylighting parameters’ values compared to subjective survey results , 2014 .

[102]  M. A. Khan,et al.  Advanced Lighting Simulation Tools for Daylighting Purpose: Powerful Features and Related Issues , 2011 .

[103]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Comparison on solar shadings: Monitoring of the thermo-physical behaviour, assessment of the energy saving, thermal comfort, natural lighting and environmental impact , 2014 .

[104]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Healthy-daylighting design for the living environment in apartments in Korea , 2010 .

[105]  Marie K. Svensson,et al.  Sky view factor analysis – implications for urban air temperature differences , 2004 .

[106]  David L. DiLaura On the Computation of Visual Comfort Probability , 1976 .

[107]  J. Veitch,et al.  From blind spot into the spotlight , 2014 .

[108]  V. S. K. Varma Namburi Comparative evaluation of lighting design software programs for analysis of daylighting in buildings , 2006 .

[109]  Arild Gustavsen,et al.  Properties, Requirements and Possibilities of Smart Windows for Dynamic Daylight and Solar Energy Control in Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2010 .

[110]  G. W. Larson,et al.  Rendering with radiance - the art and science of lighting visualization , 2004, Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics and geometric modeling.

[111]  Jozef Hraska Chronobiological aspects of green buildings daylighting , 2015 .

[112]  Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg,et al.  Visual Comfort, Discomfort Glare, and Occupant Fenestration Control: Developing a Research Agenda , 2014 .

[113]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Predicting daylight illuminance and solar irradiance on vertical surfaces based on classified standard skies , 2013 .

[114]  Jérôme Henri Kämpf,et al.  Optimisation of building form for solar energy utilisation using constrained evolutionary algorithms , 2010 .

[115]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches , 2013 .

[116]  A. Matzarakis,et al.  Comparison of models calculating the sky view factor used for urban climate investigations , 2011 .

[117]  Rafael López-Luque,et al.  Development of synthetic hemispheric projections suitable for assessing the sky view factor on vertical planes , 2015 .

[118]  Yun-Shang Chiou,et al.  An HDRi-based data acquisition system for the exterior luminous environment in the daylight simulation model , 2015 .

[119]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools , 2015 .

[120]  I. D. Watson,et al.  The determination of view-factors in urban canyons , 1984 .

[121]  Paul Fazio,et al.  Investigation of solar potential of housing units in different neighborhood designs , 2011 .

[122]  M. A. Alghoul,et al.  Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals , 2013 .

[123]  K. N. Yu,et al.  A simple and versatile 222Rn/220Rn exposure chamber , 2002 .