The measure of success: constraints, objectives, and tradeoffs in morphogen-mediated patterning.

A large, diverse, and growing number of strategies have been proposed to explain how morphogen gradients achieve robustness and precision. We argue that, to be useful, the evaluation of such strategies must take into account the constraints imposed by competing objectives and performance tradeoffs. This point is illustrated through a mathematical and computational analysis of the strategy of self-enhanced morphogen clearance. The results suggest that the usefulness of this strategy comes less from its ability to increase robustness to morphogen source fluctuations per se, than from its ability to overcome specific kinds of noise, and to increase the fraction of a morphogen gradient within which robust threshold positions may be established. This work also provides new insights into the longstanding question of why morphogen gradients show a maximum range in vivo.

[1]  Jim Hinsdale.  Salt and Pepper , 2014 .

[2]  Gregory T. Reeves,et al.  Biological Systems from an Engineer's Point of View , 2009, PLoS biology.

[3]  N. Barkai,et al.  Scaling of the BMP activation gradient in Xenopus embryos , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Optimal placement of multiple morphogen sources. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Eldon Emberly,et al.  Optimizing the readout of morphogen gradients. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  A. Kicheva,et al.  Precision of the Dpp gradient , 2008, Development.

[7]  Qing Nie,et al.  Complex Regulation of cyp26a1 Creates a Robust Retinoic Acid Gradient in the Zebrafish Embryo , 2007, PLoS biology.

[8]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[9]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Position Determination by Concentration Gradients , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Pre-Steady-State Decoding of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient , 2007, PLoS biology.

[11]  Gregory T. Reeves,et al.  Quantitative models of developmental pattern formation. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[12]  James Briscoe,et al.  The interpretation of morphogen gradients , 2006, Development.

[13]  W. Rappel,et al.  Embryonic pattern scaling achieved by oppositely directed morphogen gradients , 2006, Physical biology.

[14]  G. Campbell,et al.  Generating and interpreting the Brinker gradient in the Drosophila wing. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[15]  T. Belenkaya,et al.  Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc , 2005, Development.

[16]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Planar Cell Polarity to Understand Domineering Nonautonomy , 2005, Science.

[17]  P. Pantazis,et al.  Robust formation of morphogen gradients. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[18]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Elucidating mechanisms underlying robustness of morphogen gradients. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[19]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Self-enhanced ligand degradation underlies robustness of morphogen gradients. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[20]  T. Matsuo,et al.  Dally regulates Dpp morphogen gradient formation in the Drosophila wing , 2003, Development.

[21]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Morphogenetic apoptosis: a mechanism for correcting discontinuities in morphogen gradients. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[22]  N. Barkai,et al.  Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning , 2002, Nature.

[23]  R. Copley,et al.  HSPG modification by the secreted enzyme Notum shapes the Wingless morphogen gradient. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[24]  Paul Jung,et al.  No free lunch. , 2002, Health affairs.

[25]  S. Leibler,et al.  Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo , 2002, Nature.

[26]  John Doyle,et al.  Complexity and robustness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. O'hare,et al.  New model of ErbB‐2 over‐expression in human mammary luminal epithelial cells , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[28]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Dpp receptor levels contribute to shaping the Dpp morphogen gradient in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. , 1998, Development.

[29]  S. Torres-Schumann,et al.  TGF-beta/BMP superfamily members, Gbb-60A and Dpp, cooperate to provide pattern information and establish cell identity in the Drosophila wing. , 1998, Development.

[30]  R. Nusse,et al.  Wingless Repression of Drosophila frizzled 2 Expression Shapes the Wingless Morphogen Gradient in the Wing , 1998, Cell.

[31]  C. Neumann,et al.  Long-range action of Wingless organizes the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. , 1997, Development.

[32]  G. Struhl,et al.  Direct and Long-Range Action of a Wingless Morphogen Gradient , 1996, Cell.

[33]  R. Derynck,et al.  Ligand-independent Activation of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF) β Signaling Pathways by Heteromeric Cytoplasmic Domains of TGF-β Receptors* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  G. Struhl,et al.  Direct and Long-Range Action of a DPP Morphogen Gradient , 1996, Cell.

[35]  T. Tabata,et al.  Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs , 1994, Cell.

[36]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[37]  F. Crick.  Diffusion in Embryogenesis , 1970, Nature.

[38]  O. Shimmi,et al.  Dally regulates Dpp morphogen gradient formation by stabilizing Dpp on the cell surface. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[39]  T. Tabata,et al.  Hedgehog creates a gradient of DPP activity in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[40]  and Development , 1997 .