ERP C1 is top-down modulated by orientation perceptual learning.

The brain site of perceptual learning has been frequently debated. Recent psychophysical evidence for complete learning transfer to new retinal locations and orientations/directions suggests that perceptual learning may mainly occur in high-level brain areas. Contradictorily, ERP C1 changes associated with perceptual learning are cited as evidence for training-induced plasticity in the early visual cortex. However, C1 can be top-down modulated, which suggests the possibility that C1 changes may result from top-down modulation of the early visual cortex by high-level perceptual learning. To single out the potential top-down impact, we trained observers with a peripheral orientation discrimination task and measured C1 changes at an untrained diagonal quadrant location where learning transfer was previously known to be significant. Our assumption was that any C1 changes at this untrained location would indicate top-down modulation of the early visual cortex, rather than plasticity in the early visual cortex. The expected learning transfer was indeed accompanied with significant C1 changes. Moreover, C1 changes were absent in an untrained shape discrimination task with the same stimuli. We conclude that ERP C1 can be top-down modulated in a task-specific manner by high-level perceptual learning, so that C1 changes may not necessarily indicate plasticity in the early visual cortex. Moreover, learning transfer and associated C1 changes may indicate that learning-based top-down modulation can be remapped to early visual cortical neurons at untrained locations to enable learning transfer.

[1]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  David Pascucci,et al.  Location transfer of perceptual learning: Passive stimulation and double training , 2015, Vision Research.

[3]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[5]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  S. Luck,et al.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[7]  Cong Yu,et al.  The classical TDT perceptual learning is mostly temporal learning. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Delayed Striate Cortical Activation during Spatial Attention , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics Perceptual Learning Improves Adult Amblyopic Vision Through Rule-Based Cognitive Compensation , 2014 .

[10]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Effects of perceptual learning on primary visual cortex activity in humans , 2008, Vision Research.

[11]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier perceptual learning transfers to completely untrained retinal locations after double training: a "piggybacking" effect. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[13]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  G. Orban,et al.  Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Rule-Based Learning Explains Visual Perceptual Learning and Its Specificity and Transfer , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Si Wu,et al.  Perceptual training continuously refines neuronal population codes in primary visual cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[20]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Prolonged Training at Threshold Promotes Robust Retinotopic Specificity in Perceptual Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Klein,et al.  Complete Transfer of Perceptual Learning across Retinal Locations Enabled by Double Training , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  D. Sagi.  Perceptual learning in Vision Research , 2011, Vision Research.

[24]  J. G. Axford,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  S. Klein,et al.  Task relevancy and demand modulate double-training enabled transfer of perceptual learning , 2012, Vision Research.

[26]  Lin-Juan Cong,et al.  ERP P1-N1 changes associated with Vernier perceptual learning and its location specificity and transfer. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[27]  S. Butler,et al.  Cortical generators of the CI component of the pattern-onset visual evoked potential. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Decoupling location specificity from perceptual learning of orientation discrimination , 2010, Vision Research.

[30]  Marzia Del Zotto,et al.  Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  Lin Yang,et al.  Perceptual Learning Increases the Strength of the Earliest Signals in Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[34]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to Link Visual Contours , 2008, Neuron.