National embeddedness and calculative human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia

This article presents a study of the degree to which national institutional settings impact on the application of management practices in foreign subsidiaries of multinational companies. Applying the national business systems approach our study centres on the use of calculative human resource management (HRM) practices by subsidiaries of US multinational companies in the UK, Ireland, Germany, Denmark/Norway and Australia, respectively, in comparison with these countries’ indigenous firms.The analysis indicates that while US subsidiaries adapt to the local setting in terms of applying calculative HRM practices, they also diverge from indigenous firm practices.

[1]  Len Holden,et al.  Dynamics of Central Control and Subsidiary Autonomy in the Management of Human Resources: Case-Study Evidence from US MNCs in the UK , 2004 .

[2]  David Soskice,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Change: A Response to Three Critics , 2003 .

[3]  Mary Anne Devanna,et al.  Strategic Human Resource Management , 1984 .

[4]  M. Geppert,et al.  Change Management in MNCs: How Global Convergence Intertwines with National Diversities , 2003 .

[5]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: international strategy and management of entry modes , 2002 .

[6]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Comparative research in human resource management: a review and an example , 1996 .

[7]  R. Hyman,et al.  New frontiers in European industrial relations , 1994 .

[8]  A. Sorge,et al.  Embedding Organizations. Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context , 2000 .

[9]  A. Sorge.  International human resource management , 2004 .

[10]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Understanding Compensation Practice Variations Across Firms: The Impact of National Culture , 1998 .

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[12]  Thomas Klikauer.  Stability in Germany's Industrial Relations: A Critique on Hassel's Erosion Thesis , 2002 .

[13]  R. Whittington,et al.  For Boundedness in the Study of Comparative and International Business: The Case of the Diversified Multidivisional Corporation , 2002 .

[14]  Andrew Delios,et al.  What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel W. Gingerich,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy , 2004 .

[16]  Jill Rubery,et al.  Employer Strategy and the Labour Market , 1994 .

[17]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[18]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  The Relative Impact of Country of Origin and Universal Contingencies on Internationalization Strategies and Corporate Control in Multinational Enterprises: Worldwide and European Perspectives , 2003 .

[19]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  D. McGuire,et al.  Why Ireland? A Qualitative Review of the Factors Influencing the Location of US Multinationals in Ireland with Particular Reference to the Impact of Labour Issues , 2000 .

[21]  Hartmut Wächter,et al.  Co‐determination and strategic integration in German firms , 2002 .

[23]  W. Richard Scott.  Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[24]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[25]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  MSP5 for Windows User's Manual , 2000 .

[26]  B. Dabscheck.  Arbitration and Relations Between the Parties , 2004 .

[27]  Kirsten Bindemann.  The Dutch Model , 1999 .

[28]  Trends and emerging values in human resource management ‐ The UK scene , 2001 .

[29]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[30]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms , 1999 .

[31]  David Murphy,et al.  Still muddling through ... , 2000 .

[32]  M. Morley,et al.  Challenging collectivist traditions: individualism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites , 1997 .

[33]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  When in Rome, do they do as the Romans? HRM Practices of US Subsidiaries in Europe , 1998 .

[34]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[35]  MICHAEL H. Salamon.  Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[36]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. , 1995 .

[37]  Nick Wailes,et al.  Contrasting Systems? 100 Years of Arbitration in Australia and New Zealand , 2004 .

[38]  M. Petersen,et al.  Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[39]  David J. Hickson,et al.  Organizational structure in its context : the Aston programme 1 , 1976 .

[40]  J. Hollingsworth,et al.  Contemporary capitalism : the embeddedness of institutions , 1997 .

[41]  M. Geppert,et al.  Global Change Management Approaches in MNCs and Distinct National Trajectories: Britain and Germany Compared , 2002 .

[42]  R. Hyman,et al.  Industrial Relations in the New Europe , 1993 .

[43]  J. Hollingsworth.  Contemporary Capitalism: Continuities and Changes in Social Systems of Production: The Cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States , 1997 .

[44]  Rüdiger Pieper,et al.  Human resource management : an international comparison , 1990 .

[45]  Anke Hassel.  The Erosion of the German System of Industrial Relations , 1999 .

[46]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms , 2002 .

[48]  Mike W. Peng.  Perspectives—From China Strategy to Global Strategy , 2005 .

[49]  A. Ferner.  COUNTRY OF ORIGIN EFFECTS AND HRM IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES , 1997 .

[50]  W. Streeck,et al.  Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity , 1997 .

[51]  I. Brunstein.  Human Resource Management in Western Europe , 1995 .

[52]  Seung-Hyun Lee.  WHAT DETERMINES THE SCOPE OF THE FIRM OVER TIME? A FOCUS ON INSTITUTIONAL RELATEDNESS , 2005 .

[53]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  European human resource management in transition , 1995 .

[54]  Richard M. Locke,et al.  Employment Relations in a Changing World Economy , 1997 .

[55]  A. Ferner,et al.  The renewed ‘American Challenge’: a review of employment practice in US multinationals , 2002 .

[56]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[57]  Hafiz Mirza,et al.  Host country specific factors and the transfer of human resource management practices in multinational companies , 2004 .

[58]  M. Albert.  Capitalisme contre capitalisme , 1991 .

[59]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[60]  Edward Levitas,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[61]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .