Crosslinking of cell-derived 3D scaffolds up-regulates the stretching and unfolding of new extracellular matrix assembled by reseeded cells.

Elevated levels of tissue crosslinking are associated with numerous diseases (cancer stroma, organ fibrosis), and also eliminate the otherwise remarkable clinical successes of tissue-derived scaffolds, instead eliciting a foreign body reaction. Nevertheless, it is not well understood how the initial physical and biochemical properties of cellular microenvironments, stem cell niches, or of 3D tissue scaffolds guide the assembly and remodeling of new extracellular matrix (ECM) that is ultimately sensed by cells. Here, we incorporated FRET-based mechanical strain sensors, either into cell-derived ECM scaffolds or into the fibronectin (Fn) matrix assembled by reseeded fibroblasts, and demonstrated the following. Cell-generated tensile forces change the conformation of Fn in both 3D scaffolds and new matrix over time. The time course by which new matrix fibers are stretched by reseeded cells is accelerated by scaffold crosslinking. Importantly, stretching Fn fibers increases their elastic modulus (rigidity) and alters their biochemical display. Regulated by Fn fiber unfolding, more soluble Fn binds to the native than to the crosslinked scaffolds. Additionally, matrix assembly of fibroblasts is decreased by scaffold crosslinking. Taken together, scaffold crosslinking has a multifactorial impact on the microenvironment that reseeded cells assemble and respond to, with far-reaching implications for tissue engineering and disease physiology.

[1]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin , 2003, Nature.

[2]  R. Vessella,et al.  Tumor cell dormancy: An NCI workshop report , 2007, Cancer biology & therapy.

[3]  A. Cerami,et al.  Advanced glycosylation end products in tissue and the biochemical basis of diabetic complications. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[5]  V. Vogel,et al.  The tissue engineeting puzzle: a molecular perspective. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[7]  H. Kagan,et al.  Lysyl oxidase: properties, regulation and multiple functions in biology. , 1998, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[8]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Force-Induced Unfolding of Fibronectin in the Extracellular Matrix of Living Cells , 2007, PLoS biology.

[9]  Benjamin G Keselowsky,et al.  Myoblast proliferation and differentiation on fibronectin-coated self assembled monolayers presenting different surface chemistries. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[10]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Fibronectin extension and unfolding within cell matrix fibrils controlled by cytoskeletal tension , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures , 2008, Stem cells.

[12]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Accessibility to the Fibronectin Synergy Site in a 3D Matrix Regulates Engagement of α 5β 1 versus α vβ 3 Integrin Receptors , 2006 .

[13]  S. Badylak,et al.  Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[15]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  P. Benya,et al.  Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels , 1982, Cell.

[17]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  A structural model for force regulated integrin binding to fibronectin's RGD-synergy site. , 2002, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[18]  V. Vogel,et al.  Self-assembly of fibronectin into fibrillar networks underneath dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine monolayers: role of lipid matrix and tensile forces. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Stimulatory effects of a three-dimensional microenvironment on cell-mediated fibronectin fibrillogenesis , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Mechanotransduction involving multimodular proteins: converting force into biochemical signals. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[21]  J. Sottile,et al.  Fibronectin matrix turnover occurs through a caveolin-1-dependent process. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  D. Hocking,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Fibronectin Mechanically Couples Skeletal Muscle Contraction With Local Vasodilation , 2008, Circulation research.

[23]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[24]  R. Segal,et al.  Studies on intercellular LETS glycoprotein matrices , 1978, Cell.

[25]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[26]  Kristopher E Kubow,et al.  Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[28]  F J Schoen,et al.  Calcification of subcutaneously implanted type I collagen sponges. Effects of formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde pretreatments. , 1986, The American journal of pathology.

[29]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Andras Czirok,et al.  New insights into extracellular matrix assembly and reorganization from dynamic imaging of extracellular matrix proteins in living osteoblasts , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[33]  M J Bissell,et al.  How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression? , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[35]  W Matthew Petroll,et al.  Direct, dynamic assessment of cell-matrix interactions inside fibrillar collagen lattices. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[36]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[37]  H. Erickson,et al.  Dynamics and elasticity of the fibronectin matrix in living cell culture visualized by fibronectin-green fluorescent protein. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films : correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion , 2004 .

[39]  L. Griffith,et al.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Cell fate regulation by coupling mechanical cycles to biochemical signaling pathways. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[42]  M. Bissell,et al.  Reprogramming stem cells is a microenvironmental task , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  K. Illmensee,et al.  Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Ross Tubo,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis , 2007, Nature.

[47]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and Cancer in 3D , 2007, Cell.

[48]  E. Cukierman,et al.  Staged stromal extracellular 3D matrices differentially regulate breast cancer cell responses through PI3K and beta1-integrins , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[49]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[50]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Basic mechanism of three-dimensional collagen fibre transport by fibroblasts , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[52]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  D. Boettiger,et al.  Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[54]  M. Cooper,et al.  Importance of advanced glycation end products in diabetes-associated cardiovascular and renal disease. , 2004, American journal of hypertension.

[55]  A. Trumpp,et al.  Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[56]  P. McKeown-Longo,et al.  Localization of fibronectin matrix assembly sites on fibroblasts and endothelial cells. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[57]  R. Jilka,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Made by Bone Marrow Cells Facilitates Expansion of Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells and Prevents Their Differentiation Into Osteoblasts , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[58]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Assay to mechanically tune and optically probe fibrillar fibronectin conformations from fully relaxed to breakage. , 2008, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[59]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[60]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-mediated Contractility Exposes a Cryptic Site in Fibronectin and Induces Fibronectin Matrix Assembly , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  E. Cukierman,et al.  Stroma-derived three-dimensional matrices are necessary and sufficient to promote desmoplastic differentiation of normal fibroblasts. , 2005, The American journal of pathology.

[62]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[63]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  Benjamin G. Keselowsky,et al.  Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  B. Geiger,et al.  Force-induced fibronectin fibrillogenesis in vitro , 2008 .

[66]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. , 2004, Transplant immunology.

[67]  George P McCabe,et al.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[68]  K. Beningo,et al.  Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Matrix Control of Stem Cell Fate , 2006, Cell.

[70]  V. Vogel,et al.  Coexisting conformations of fibronectin in cell culture imaged using fluorescence resonance energy transfer , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  Kristopher E Kubow,et al.  Fibronectin in aging extracellular matrix fibrils is progressively unfolded by cells and elicits an enhanced rigidity response. , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[72]  D. Boettiger,et al.  A novel mode of cell detachment from fibrillar fibronectin matrix under shear , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[73]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[74]  Rita Casadio,et al.  Transglutaminases: nature's biological glues. , 2002, The Biochemical journal.

[75]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.