Evaluation of the WRF Double-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme for Precipitating Convection

This study demonstrates the characteristics of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Double-Moment 6-Class (WDM6) Microphysics scheme for representing precipitating moist convection in 3D platforms, relative to the WSM6 scheme that has been widely used in the WRF community. For a case study of convective system over the Great Plains, the WDM6 scheme improves the evolutionary features such as the bow-type echo in the leading edge of the squall line. We also found that the WRF with WDM6 scheme removes spurious oceanic rainfall that is a systematic defect resulting from the use of the WSM6 scheme alone. The simulated summer monsoon rainfall in East Asia is improved by weakening (strengthening) light (heavy) precipitation activity. These changes can be explained by the fact that the WDM6 scheme has a wider range in cloud and rain number concentrations than does the WSM6 scheme.

[1]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[2]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[3]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[4]  J. Otkin,et al.  Comparison of WRF Model-Simulated and MODIS-Derived Cloud Data , 2008 .

[5]  M. Khairoutdinov,et al.  A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus , 2000 .

[6]  Jean-Pierre Pinty,et al.  A comprehensive two‐moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. II: 2D experiments with a non‐hydrostatic model , 2000 .

[7]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Research Needs and Directions of Regional Climate Modeling Using WRF and CCSM , 2006 .

[8]  Yang Hong,et al.  Evaluation of TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and Its Utility in Hydrologic Prediction in the La Plata Basin , 2008 .

[9]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Quantitative precipitation forecast experiments of heavy rainfall over Jeju Island on 14-16 September 2007 using the WRF model , 2009 .

[10]  Jean-Pierre Pinty,et al.  A comprehensive two‐moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests , 2000 .

[11]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Next-Day Convection-Allowing WRF Model Guidance: A Second Look at 2-km versus 4-km Grid Spacing , 2009 .

[12]  S. Twomey,et al.  The nuclei of natural cloud formation part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration , 1959 .

[13]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Value of Real-Time Vegetation Fraction to Forecasts of Severe Convection in High-Resolution Models , 2009 .

[14]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  Experiences with 0–36-h Explicit Convective Forecasts with the WRF-ARW Model , 2008 .

[15]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[16]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for WRF : Formulation and Preliminary Results , 2009 .

[17]  Rita D. Roberts,et al.  Summary of Convective Storm Initiation and Evolution during IHOP: Observational and Modeling Perspective , 2006 .

[18]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6) , 2006 .

[19]  William H. Heiss,et al.  Nexrad - Next generation weather radar (WSR-88D) , 1990 .

[20]  Jordan G. Powers.  Numerical Prediction of an Antarctic Severe Wind Event with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model , 2007 .

[21]  J. Dudhia.  Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model , 1989 .

[22]  G. Mellor,et al.  Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems , 1982 .

[23]  Timothy D. Crum,et al.  The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D Operational Support Facility , 1993 .

[24]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[25]  Z. Pu,et al.  Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations , 2008 .

[26]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Diurnal variations of simulated precipitation over East Asia in two regional climate models , 2010 .

[27]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[28]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Development of an Effective Double-Moment Cloud Microphysics Scheme with Prognostic Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) for Weather and Climate Models , 2010 .

[29]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Examination of convection-allowing configurations of the WRF model for the prediction of severe convective weather : The SPC/NSSL spring program 2004 , 2006 .

[30]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[31]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  Evaluation of WRF Forecasts of Tornadic and Nontornadic Outbreaks when Initialized with Synoptic-Scale Input , 2008 .

[32]  S. Ghan,et al.  A Comparison of Three Different Modeling Strategies for Evaluating Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations , 1999 .

[33]  Yanluan Lin,et al.  The 4–5 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 Event: Observed Microphysics and Comparisons with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model , 2009 .

[34]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  A New Method for Representing Mixed-phase Particle Fall Speeds in Bulk Microphysics Parameterizations , 2008 .

[35]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation , 2004 .

[36]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[37]  John S. Kain,et al.  The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update , 2004 .