Enhancement and Suppression of Ionization in Drug Analysis Using HPLC-MS/MS in Support of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Review of Current Knowledge of Its Minimization and Assessment: Erratum.

High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry is commonly used for quantitation of analytes in biological matrices, because of the selectivity, sensitivity, and high throughput offered by this technique. However, the presence of both suppression and enhancement of ionization (SEI) by matrix components is an increasingly recognized impediment to accurate results. The existence of SEI indicates that ionization efficiency is a result of the chemical environment seen by both the analyte and internal standard during ion formation. SEI is influenced by the type and the make of ion source used, mobile-phase composition, extent of sample preparation, and the ability to chromatographically separate other compounds that may influence ionization of the analyte and/or internal standard. A comprehensive review of the phenomenon of SEI in high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was conducted, and a summary of salient papers relating to therapeutic agents in biological matrices is presented. Suggestions for approaches to minimize, normalize, or assess SEI and its deleterious effect on accuracy and sensitivity, and hence the validity of quantitative results, are provided. Consideration is also given to a strategy to test for SEI, including the number of samples from different sources that are required to adequately test for SEI.

[1]  J. Foley,et al.  Reduction in matrix-related signal suppression effects in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using on-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  S. Wren,et al.  Use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical development. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  J. Duley,et al.  Simultaneous determination of thymine and its sequential catabolites dihydrothymine and β-ureidoisobutyrate in human plasma and urine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with pharmacokinetic application. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  F. Gosetti,et al.  Signal suppression/enhancement in high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Dietrich A. Volmer,et al.  Recent advances in sample preparation techniques to overcome difficulties encountered during quantitative analysis of small molecules from biofluids using LC-MS/MS. , 2014, The Analyst.

[6]  Sihe Wang,et al.  A Sensitive and Interference-Free Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Measuring Metanephrines in Plasma , 2013 .

[7]  C. Mallet,et al.  A study of ion suppression effects in electrospray ionization from mobile phase additives and solid-phase extracts. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[8]  P. Taylor,et al.  Monitoring Salivary Melatonin Concentrations in Children With Sleep Disorders Using Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2013, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[9]  Omnia A. Ismaiel,et al.  Monitoring phospholipids for assessment of ion enhancement and ion suppression in ESI and APCI LC/MS/MS for chlorpheniramine in human plasma and the importance of multiple source matrix effect evaluations. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[10]  Yuan-qing Xia,et al.  Phospholipids in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry bioanalysis: comparison of three tandem mass spectrometric techniques for monitoring plasma phospholipids, the effect of mobile phase composition on phospholipids elution and the association of phospholipids with matrix effects. , 2009, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[11]  Vincenzo Pucci,et al.  A novel strategy for reducing phospholipids-based matrix effect in LC-ESI-MS bioanalysis by means of HybridSPE. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[12]  J. Wieling LC-MS-MS experiences with internal standards , 2002 .

[13]  A. Gusev,et al.  Signal suppression/enhancement in HPLC-ESI-MS/MS from concomitant medications. , 2007, Biomedical chromatography : BMC.

[14]  J. Antignac,et al.  The ion suppression phenomenon in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and its consequences in the field of residue analysis , 2005 .

[15]  D. Hercules,et al.  LC-MS/MS signal suppression effects in the analysis of pesticides in complex environmental matrices , 2001, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[16]  A. Furey,et al.  Ion suppression; a critical review on causes, evaluation, prevention and applications. , 2013, Talanta.

[17]  Mohammed Jemal,et al.  Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry methods for quantitation of mevalonic acid in human plasma and urine: method validation, demonstration of using a surrogate analyte, and demonstration of unacceptable matrix effect in spite of use of a stable isotope analog internal standard. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[18]  L. Rayleigh XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity , 1882 .

[19]  Sherry Wang,et al.  Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response? A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  Jim X. Shen,et al.  Minimization of ion suppression in LC-MS/MS analysis through the application of strong cation exchange solid-phase extraction (SCX-SPE). , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[21]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Gas chromatography coupled to atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry (GC-API-MS): review. , 2015, Analytica chimica acta.

[22]  A. Fernández-Alba,et al.  Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  L. Romanyshyn,et al.  Ultra-short columns and ballistic gradients: considerations for ultra-fast chromatographic liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  H. Urey,et al.  Fractionation of the Lithium and Potassium Isotopes by Chemical Exchange with Zeolites , 1938 .

[25]  T. Annesley Ion suppression in mass spectrometry. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[26]  Timothy Olah,et al.  Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization , 2000, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[27]  R L Foltz,et al.  Ionization enhancement in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and suppression in electrospray ionization between target drugs and stable-isotope-labeled internal standards in quantitative liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[28]  P. Taylor,et al.  A rapid HPLC-mass spectrometry cyclosporin method suitable for current monitoring practices. , 2005, Clinical biochemistry.

[29]  E. Woolf,et al.  Effect of the sample matrix on the determination of indinavir in human urine by HPLC with turbo ion spray tandem mass spectrometric detection. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[30]  D L Buhrman,et al.  Quantitation of SR 27417 in human plasma using electrospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A study of ion suppression , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[31]  A. Verstraete,et al.  Enhanced method performance due to a shorter chromatographic run-time in a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for paclitaxel. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[32]  H. Rosing,et al.  Stable isotopically labeled internal standards in quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: necessity or not? , 2005, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[33]  K. Dooley Tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical chemistry laboratory. , 2003, Clinical biochemistry.

[34]  R. Weaver,et al.  Identification and reduction of ion suppression effects on pharmacokinetic parameters by polyethylene glycol 400. , 2006, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[35]  Thorsten Reemtsma,et al.  Evaluation of three calibration methods to compensate matrix effects in environmental analysis with LC-ESI-MS , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[36]  B. Matuszewski,et al.  Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  C. N. Filer Isotopic fractionation of organic compounds in chromatography , 1999 .

[38]  Dieter Zimmer,et al.  Matrix effects during analysis of plasma samples by electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry: practical approaches to their elimination. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[39]  Sterner,et al.  Signal suppression in electrospray ionization Fourier transform mass spectrometry of multi-component samples , 2000, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[40]  Liang Li,et al.  Stable-isotope dimethylation labeling combined with LC-ESI MS for quantification of amine-containing metabolites in biological samples. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  H. Karnes,et al.  Investigation of endogenous blood plasma phospholipids, cholesterol and glycerides that contribute to matrix effects in bioanalysis by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[42]  K. Ensing,et al.  On-line coupling of solid-phase extraction with mass spectrometry for the analysis of biological samples. I. Determination of clenbuterol in urine. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[43]  S. Jingu,et al.  Utility of postcolumn addition of 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a signal-enhancing modifier, for metabolite screening with liquid chromatography and negative ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[44]  D. H. Strand,et al.  ¹³C labelled internal standards--a solution to minimize ion suppression effects in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of drugs in biological samples? , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[45]  T. Olah,et al.  The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds. , 1999, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[46]  D. Fraier,et al.  Ion-suppression effects in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry due to a formulation agent, a case study in drug discovery bioanalysis. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[47]  A. Somogyi,et al.  Subjective and physiological responses among racemic-methadone maintenance patients in relation to relative (S)- vs. (R)-methadone exposure. , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[48]  P. Taylor Matrix effects: the Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2005, Clinical biochemistry.

[49]  M. Miller Agency , 2010 .