Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
T A Cooper | P. VanRaden | G. Wiggans | J. Cole | G R Wiggans | P M Vanraden | J B Cole | T. Cooper
[1] P. VanRaden,et al. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[2] F. Seefried,et al. Implementation of genomic evaluation in German Holsteins , 2009 .
[3] P. VanRaden,et al. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[4] A. E. Freeman,et al. Biases in Predicted Transmitting Abilities of Sires When Daughters Receive Preferential Treatment , 1995 .
[5] P. Boettcher,et al. Potential Biases in Predicted Transmitting Abilities of Females from Preferential Treatment , 1994 .
[6] L. D. Van Vleck,et al. Bias in genetic evaluations by records of cows treated with bovine somatotropin. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[7] Paul M VanRaden,et al. International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[8] P. VanRaden,et al. Reliability of genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle in Canada , 2009 .
[9] P. VanRaden,et al. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.
[10] P M VanRaden,et al. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.
[11] D. Johnson,et al. Application of Genomic Selection in the New Zealand Dairy Cattle Industry , 2010 .