New IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification and Invasive Tumor Size are Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to analyze and validate the prognostic impact of the new lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) classification proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society and invasive tumor size in stage I lung ADC of Japanese patients. Methods: We reclassified 191 stage I ADCs according to the new classification. The percentage of each histological subtype and the predominant type were determined. In addition, both total tumor size and invasive tumor size were examined. The relationship between these results and clinicopathological backgrounds was investigated statistically. Results: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma was 100%; lepidic-predominant ADCs, 94.9%; papillary-predominant ADCs, 85.4%; acinar-predominant ADCs, 89.7%; and solid-predominant ADCs, 54%. The predominant growth pattern was significantly correlated with DFS (p < 0.001, overall). With regard to tumor size, total tumor size was not correlated with DFS (p = 0.475, overall), however, invasive tumor size was significantly correlated with DFS (⩽0.5 cm/ > 0.5cm, ⩽1cm/ >1 cm, ⩽2 cm/>2 cm, ⩽3 cm/ >3cm, 100%/91.5%/85.9%/80.8%/66.7%% in 5-year DFS) (p = 0.006, overall). A multivariate analysis showed solid-predominant and invasive tumor size were independent predictors of increased risk of recurrence (solid versus nonsolid: hazard ratio = 4.08, 95% confidence interval:1.59–10.5, p = 0.003; invasive tumor size: hazard ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval:1.14–3.63, p = 0.016). Conclusion: The new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society ADC classification and invasive tumor size are very useful predictors of recurrence of stage I ADCs in Japanese patients.

[1]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Grade of Stromal Invasion in Small Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Histopathological Minimal Invasion and Prognosis , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[2]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .

[3]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[4]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  A Grading System of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on Histologic Pattern is Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Tumors , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[6]  D. Carter TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors , 1998 .

[7]  R. Rami-Porta,et al.  The New Tumor, Node, and Metastasis Staging System , 2011, Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  B. Stewart,et al.  World Cancer Report , 2003 .

[9]  P. Boyle,et al.  World Cancer Report 2008 , 2009 .

[10]  Michael Thomas,et al.  The novel histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification system of lung adenocarcinoma is a stage-independent predictor of survival. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  Zoe Wainer,et al.  Does Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtype Predict Patient Survival?: A Clinicopathologic Study Based on the New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  W. Gerald,et al.  Lung Adenocarcinoma: Modification of the 2004 WHO Mixed Subtype to Include the Major Histologic Subtype Suggests Correlations Between Papillary and Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma Subtypes, EGFR Mutations and Gene Expression Analysis , 2008, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Gene expression–based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[15]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  J. Crowley,et al.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Seventh) Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.