Computational Models of SWR

[1]  Nick Chater,et al.  Bottom-up connectionist modelling of speech , 1995 .

[2]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. , 2001, Psychological review.

[4]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[5]  P. Luce,et al.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[7]  M. Gareth Gaskell,et al.  Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of variable-rate speech categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Norris,et al.  The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Modeling the word recognition data of Vitevitch and Luce (1998): Is it ARTful? , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation , 2004, Neural Networks.

[15]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Global model analysis by parameter space partitioning. , 2019, Psychological review.

[16]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  R. Cole.  Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .

[20]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[21]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  Simulating the time course of spoken word recognition : an analysis of lexical competition in TRACE , 1998 .

[22]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Computational and behavioral investigations of lexically induced delays in phoneme recognition , 2005 .

[24]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[25]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[27]  D. Massaro.  Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  M. Pitt,et al.  Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .

[29]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[32]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[33]  Karl J. Friston.  Learning and inference in the brain , 2003, Neural Networks.

[34]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Ted J. Strauss,et al.  jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[36]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[37]  James M. McQueen,et al.  The ghost of Christmas future: Didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus and Aslin (2003) , 2003 .

[38]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[39]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[40]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Modularity and the processing of closed-class words , 1993 .

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes , 1988 .

[42]  C M Connine,et al.  Auditory word recognition: extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Monitoring sentence comprehension , 1979 .

[44]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[45]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[46]  Dennis Norris,et al.  A dynamic-net model of human speech recognition , 1991 .

[47]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Simple Recurrent Networks and Competition Effects in Spoken Word Recognition , 2000 .

[48]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[49]  R. M. Warren.  Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[50]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Nondeterminism, pleiotropy, and single-word reading: Theoretical and practical concerns , 2007 .

[51]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[52]  A. Samuel.  Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Strategic Control Over Rate of Processing in Word Reading: A Computational Investigation of the Tempo-Naming Task , 2000 .

[54]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[55]  James L. McClelland.  Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  M. MacDonald.  Distributional Information in Language Comprehension, Production, and Acquisition: Three Puzzles and a Moral , 2013 .

[59]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[60]  A. Samuel.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring , 1997 .

[63]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .

[64]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[65]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .

[66]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[67]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[68]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[69]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain , 2000 .

[70]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  ON THE INTERPRETATION OF COMPUTATIONAL MODELS: THE CASE OF TRACE , 2001 .

[71]  Louis ten Bosch,et al.  How Should a Speech Recognizer Work? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[72]  A. Samuel.  Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .

[73]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Response to McQueen et al.: Theoretical and empirical arguments support interactive processing , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[75]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Introduction to Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes , 1998 .

[76]  R. Ellis,et al.  Connectionist psychology: A text with readings , 1999 .

[77]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[78]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[79]  David C. Plaut,et al.  The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production ; A distributed connectionist approach , 1998 .

[80]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[83]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[84]  Athanassios Protopapas.  Connectionist modeling of speech perception , 1999 .

[85]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[86]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[87]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[88]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations , 1997 .

[89]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  M. Masson.  A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .