Effects of local factors on plant species richness and composition of Alpine meadows

Abstract The determinants of plant species richness and composition of meadows are often mutually related, showing joint effects on plant diversity. Thus, the specific objective of this paper was to evaluate the relative importance of soil, topography, and field management explanatory variables on plant species richness and composition of mown meadows in an area of the Southern Alps. The data consisted of 159 taxa sampled during the summer of 2003 in 56 10 × 10 m 2 sampling plots. For each plot, 25 explanatory variables were recorded. The variation in species richness and composition was divided into the three sets of explanatory variables using a variation partitioning method. Species richness was mostly controlled both by the short-term effect of nitrogen fertilisation, and, as stressed by studies in other landscape contexts in Europe, by the long-term effect of soil phosphorus accumulation. The decrease of plant species number on the most fertile meadows was the consequence of the dominance of few competitors or ruderals, which prevented the establishment of small stress-tolerant species. In contrast to species richness, plant species composition presented an important pure effect of topography (altitude and slope). Species composition depended on several topography, soil, and field management factors. Thus, for both conservation and restoration of species-rich hay meadows, it is necessary to maintain a low level of soil P content, and to prevent the abandonment of parcels on steep slopes and in marginal areas, because these hosted the highest level of plant diversity.

[1]  L. Mucina,et al.  Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil III , 1993 .

[2]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Association between lowland grassland plant communities and soil properties , 2002 .

[3]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[4]  J. Willems,et al.  Long-term after effects of fertilization on above-ground phytomass and species diversity in calcareous grassland , 1996 .

[5]  S. Bråkenhielm,et al.  A statistical approach to decompose ecological variation , 1995 .

[6]  Soil, site and management components of variation in species composition of agricultural grasslands in western Norway , 2004 .

[7]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Allocating C-S-R plant functional types : a soft approach to a hard problem , 1999 .

[8]  Magne Sætersdal,et al.  The importance of traditional meadow management techniques for conservation of vascular plant species richness in Norway , 2004 .

[9]  E. van der Maarel,et al.  Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity , 1979, Vegetatio.

[10]  R. M. Nally.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  P. Edwards,et al.  Estimating the biodiversity of hay meadows in north-eastern Switzerland on the basis of vegetation structure , 2002 .

[12]  R. Wisskirchen,et al.  Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands , 1998 .

[13]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[14]  K. Thompson,et al.  A new practical tool for deriving a functional signature for herbaceous vegetation , 2004 .

[15]  J. Bakker,et al.  Relationship between soil chemical factors and grassland diversity , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[16]  R. Marrs,et al.  Trends in soil chemistry and floristics associated with the establishment of a low-input meadow system on an arable clay soil in Essex, England. , 1997 .

[17]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[18]  A. Flecker,et al.  LOCAL VS. LANDSCAPE CONTROLS ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN BEAVER MEADOWS , 2003 .

[19]  M. Luoto,et al.  New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Isselstein,et al.  Potassium cycling and losses in grassland systems : a review , 2005 .

[21]  Matt A. Sanderson,et al.  Patterns of plant species richness in pasture lands of the northeast United States , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[22]  A. García.  Conserving the species-rich meadows of Europe , 1992 .

[23]  E. Turtola,et al.  Phosphorus loss from different farming systems estimated from soil surface phosphorus balance , 2005 .

[24]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Influence of slope and aspect on long‐term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands , 2006 .

[25]  F. Berendse,et al.  Competition and nutrient availability in heathland and grassland ecosystems , 1990 .

[26]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[27]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Plant species richness, functional type and soil properties of grasslands and allied vegetation in English Environmentally Sensitive Areas , 2002 .

[28]  M. Sebastià.  Role of topography and soils in grassland structuring at the landscape and community scales , 2004 .

[29]  Rademacher,et al.  Long‐term effects of fertilizer on soil nutrient concentration, yield, forage quality and floristic composition of a hay meadow in the Eifel mountains, Germany , 1999 .

[30]  R. Brys,et al.  Short-term effects of different management regimes on the response of calcareous grassland vegetation to increased nitrogen , 2003 .