The human brain reveals resting state activity patterns that are predictive of biases in attitudes toward robots

Biases toward treating robots as intentional agents or mechanical artifacts show a distinct neural activation pattern at rest. The increasing presence of robots in society necessitates a deeper understanding into what attitudes people have toward robots. People may treat robots as mechanistic artifacts or may consider them to be intentional agents. This might result in explaining robots’ behavior as stemming from operations of the mind (intentional interpretation) or as a result of mechanistic design (mechanistic interpretation). Here, we examined whether individual attitudes toward robots can be differentiated on the basis of default neural activity pattern during resting state, measured with electroencephalogram (EEG). Participants observed scenarios in which a humanoid robot was depicted performing various actions embedded in daily contexts. Before they were introduced to the task, we measured their resting state EEG activity. We found that resting state EEG beta activity differentiated people who were later inclined toward interpreting robot behaviors as either mechanistic or intentional. This pattern is similar to the pattern of activity in the default mode network, which was previously demonstrated to have a social role. In addition, gamma activity observed when participants were making decisions about a robot’s behavior indicates a relationship between theory of mind and said attitudes. Thus, we provide evidence that individual biases toward treating robots as either intentional agents or mechanistic artifacts can be detected at the neural level, already in a resting state EEG signal.

[1]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  T. Koenig,et al.  Topographic Electrophysiological Signatures of fMRI Resting State Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[3]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Single-Trial Normalization for Event-Related Spectral Decomposition Reduces Sensitivity to Noisy Trials , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[4]  J. Perner,et al.  Theory of mind, language and the temporoparietal junction mystery , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  B. W. van Dijk,et al.  Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  F. Ciardo,et al.  Do We Adopt the Intentional Stance Toward Humanoid Robots? , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  D. Premack,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  D. Dennett The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[15]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[17]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Cortical Core for Dynamic Integration of Functional Networks in the Resting Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[20]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[21]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Towards Socially Assistive Robotics , 2006 .

[22]  M. Meyer Social by Default: Characterizing the Social Functions of the Resting Brain , 2019, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[23]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development , 2010, Neural Networks.

[25]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[26]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[28]  N. Shah,et al.  The Default Mode Network and EEG Regional Spectral Power: A Simultaneous fMRI-EEG Study , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna,et al.  The Brain’s Default Network and Its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[30]  Viviana Betti,et al.  Cortical cores in network dynamics , 2018, NeuroImage.

[31]  Michael Szollosy Why Are We Afraid of Robots? The Role of Projection in the Popular Conception of Robots , 2015 .

[32]  D. Dennett Précis of The Intentional Stance , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  M. Raichle The brain's default mode network. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Meghan L. Meyer,et al.  The Default Mode of Human Brain Function Primes the Intentional Stance , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Dana Samson,et al.  Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Paolo Belardinelli,et al.  The impact of GABAergic drugs on TMS-induced brain oscillations in human motor cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[38]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[39]  C. Frith The social brain? , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy , 2003, Robotica.

[41]  E. Maris Statistical testing in electrophysiological studies. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[42]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[44]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Gamma-band activity in the human superior temporal sulcus during mentalizing from nonverbal social cues. , 2009, Psychophysiology.