Bacterial Biofilm Degradation Using Extracellular Enzymes Produced by Penicillium janthinellum EU2D-21 under Submerged Fermentation

Bacterial biofilms are the bacterial aggregates that are embedded in the self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that cause persistent bacterial infections posing significant medical challenges. They are recalcitrant to antibiotics and host defenses which make the treatments difficult and costly. Penicillium janthinellum mutant EU2D-21 was found to produce extracellular enzyme complex (amylase, cellulase, protease) under submerged fermentation. Maximum specific enzyme activities were found to be 3.04 IU/mg, 2.61 IU/mg and 3.39 IU/mg for alpha-amylase, cellulase and protease respectively, after 8 days of incubation at 30˚C. We evaluated the enzyme complex for its ability to target and degrade the biofilms of different bacteria. We found that it degraded biofilms of Escherichia coli (85.5%), Salmonella enterica (79.72%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (88.76%) and Staphyloccus aureus (87.42%) within 1 h of incubation at 50˚C. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM), quantitation of biofilm removal assay and Crystal violet assay demonstrated that the enzyme complex detached the biofilm exo-polysaccharide matrix and bacteria from the cell surface. These results illustrate the feasibility and benefits of using this enzyme complex as anti-biofilm therapeutics to eradicate biofilms. This can also be used as a promising strategy to improve treatment of multidrug resistant bacterial infections.

[1]  Bikram Banerjee,et al.  Enzymatic degradation of bacterial biofilms using Aspergillus clavatus MTCC 1323 , 2015, Microbiology.

[2]  R. Hancock,et al.  Broad-Spectrum Anti-biofilm Peptide That Targets a Cellular Stress Response , 2014, PLoS pathogens.

[3]  Nathaniel C. Cady,et al.  Inhibition of Biofilm Formation, Quorum Sensing and Infection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Natural Products-Inspired Organosulfur Compounds , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  A. Azad,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl polysaccharide reduces neutrophil phagocytosis and the oxidative response by limiting complement‐mediated opsonization , 2012, Cellular microbiology.

[5]  C. Potera.  Forging a Link Between Biofilms and Disease , 1999, Science.

[6]  P. Bernfeld,et al.  [17] Amylases, α and β , 1955 .

[7]  Tarea L. Burton,et al.  Infection and Drug Resistance Dovepress Enzymatic Degradation of in Vitro Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilms Supplemented with Human Plasma , 2022 .

[8]  Youngjoo Byun,et al.  6-Gingerol reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence via quorum sensing inhibition , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  S. Molin,et al.  Polysaccharides serve as scaffold of biofilms formed by mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2012, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[10]  D. Davies,et al.  A Fatty Acid Messenger Is Responsible for Inducing Dispersion in Microbial Biofilms , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  Lin Chen,et al.  Detection Techniques for Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Biofilms: A Review , 2016 .

[12]  Philipp Stiefel,et al.  Enzymes Enhance Biofilm Removal Efficiency of Cleaners , 2016, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  D. Hassett,et al.  Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Biofilm Dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  A. Ratner,et al.  DNase inhibits Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms in vitro and in vivo. , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  Exopolysaccharide biosynthetic glycoside hydrolases can be utilized to disrupt and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms , 2015 .

[17]  C. Craik,et al.  Proteases as therapeutics. , 2011, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  Wuxia Zhang,et al.  Chitosan Coupling Makes Microbial Biofilms Susceptible to Antibiotics , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Thiol reductive stress induces cellulose-anchored biofilm formation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2016, Nature Communications.

[20]  J. Wenke,et al.  Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections , 2018, Journal of bone and joint infection.

[21]  T. Masukoa.  Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol-sulfuric acid method in microplate format , 2005 .

[22]  D. Sheppard.  Molecular mechanism of Aspergillus fumigatus adherence to host constituents. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[23]  H. G. Vartak,et al.  A low molecular weight alkaline proteinase fromConidiobolus coronatus , 1991, Biotechnology Letters.

[24]  M. Oh,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: risk factors for mortality and influence of delayed receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[25]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  aBiofilm: a resource of anti-biofilm agents and their potential implications in targeting antibiotic drug resistance , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Thomas Bjarnsholt,et al.  Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. , 2010, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[27]  R. Deora,et al.  Extracellular DNA Is Essential for Maintaining Bordetella Biofilm Integrity on Abiotic Surfaces and in the Upper Respiratory Tract of Mice , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  D. Gokhale,et al.  Strain improvement of Penicillium janthinellum NCIM 1171 for increased cellulase production. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[29]  M. Smeltzer,et al.  Impact of individual extracellular proteases on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation in diverse clinical isolates and their isogenic sarA mutants , 2014, MicrobiologyOpen.