Can catch share fisheries better track management targets

Fisheries management based on catch shares – divisions of annual fleet-wide quotas among individuals or groups – has been strongly supported for their economic benefits, but biological consequences have not been rigorously quantified. We used a global meta-analysis of 345 stocks to assess whether fisheries under catch shares were more likely to track management targets set for sustainable harvest than fisheries managed only by fleet-wide quota caps or effort controls. We examined three ratios: catch-to-quota, current exploitation rate to target exploitation rate and current biomass to target biomass. For each, we calculated the mean response, variation around the target and the frequency of undesirable outcomes with respect to these targets. Regional effects were stronger than any other explanatory variable we examined. After accounting for region, we found the effects of catch shares primarily on catch-to-quota ratios: these ratios were less variable over time than in other fisheries. Over-exploitation occurred in only 9% of stocks under catch shares compared to 13% of stocks under fleet-wide quota caps. Additionally, overexploitation occurred in 41% of stocks under effort controls, suggesting a substantial benefit of quota caps alone. In contrast, there was no evidence for a response in the biomass of exploited populations because of either fleet-wide quota caps or individual catch shares. Thus, for many fisheries, management controls improve under catch shares in terms of reduced variation in catch around quota targets, but ecological benefits in terms of increased biomass may not be realized by catch shares alone.

[1]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Contrasting Global Trends in Marine Fishery Status Obtained from Catches and from Stock Assessments , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  J. Parslow.  Individual transferable quotas and the “tragedy of the commons” , 2010 .

[3]  Ana F. Militino,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2010 .

[4]  Cóilín Minto,et al.  Trends in the abundance of marine fishes , 2010 .

[5]  R. Watson,et al.  Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Alexander Proelß,et al.  Rebuilding fish stocks no later than 2015: will Europe meet the deadline? , 2010 .

[7]  Y. Shin,et al.  Ranking the ecological relative status of exploited marine ecosystems , 2010 .

[8]  Y. Shin,et al.  Relating marine ecosystem indicators to fishing and environmental drivers: an elucidation of contrasting responses , 2010 .

[9]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems , 2010 .

[10]  T. Essington,et al.  Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[12]  D. N. Edwards,et al.  The elephant in the room: The hidden costs of leasing individual transferable fishing quotas , 2009 .

[13]  D. Bromley.  Abdicating responsibility: the deceits of fisheries policy. , 2009 .

[14]  C. Chu.  Thirty years later: the global growth of ITQs and their influence on stock status in marine fisheries , 2009 .

[15]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Management Effectiveness of the World's Marine Fisheries , 2009, PLoS biology.

[16]  Trevor A. Branch,et al.  How do individual transferable quotas affect marine ecosystems , 2009 .

[17]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  M. Gibbs,et al.  Fishing for More Effective Incentives , 2009, Science.

[19]  I. Caldwell,et al.  Diverse Fisheries Require Diverse Solutions , 2009, Science.

[20]  S. Gaines,et al.  Can Catch Shares Prevent Fisheries Collapse? , 2008, Science.

[21]  Grafton,et al.  Positioning Fisheries in a Changing World , 2008 .

[22]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Matching catches to quotas in a multispecies trawl fishery: targeting and avoidance behavior under individual transferable quotas , 2008 .

[23]  D. Griffith.  The ecological implications of individual fishing quotas and harvest cooperatives , 2008 .

[24]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Reanalyses of Gulf of Mexico fisheries data: Landings can be misleading in assessments of fisheries and fisheries ecosystems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  R. Hilborn.  Managing fisheries is managing people: what has been learned? , 2007 .

[26]  Shane A. Richards,et al.  Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology , 2007 .

[27]  R. Grafton,et al.  Benchmarking for Fisheries Governance , 2007 .

[28]  C W Clark,et al.  Current Problems in the Management of Marine Fisheries , 2007, Science.

[29]  M. Wilberg,et al.  Comment on "Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services" , 2007, Science.

[30]  M. Gibbs.  Lesser-known consequences of managing marine fisheries using individual transferable quotas , 2007 .

[31]  James N. Sanchirico,et al.  Catch-quota balancing in multispecies individual fishing quotas , 2006 .

[32]  Gavin Fay,et al.  Fleet dynamics and fishermen behavior: lessons for fisheries managers , 2006 .

[33]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding , 2006 .

[34]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Incentive-based Approaches to Sustainable Fisheries , 2006 .

[35]  R. Arnason.  Property Rights in Fisheries: Iceland’s Experience with ITQs , 2005, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[36]  Tim D. Smith,et al.  Autopsy your dead…and living: a proposal for fisheries science, fisheries management and fisheries , 2005 .

[37]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  B. Worm,et al.  Extinction, survival or recovery of large predatory fishes , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management , 2004, Science.

[40]  G. Munro.  The conservation and management of shared fish stocks : legal and economic aspects , 2004 .

[41]  G. J. Piet,et al.  Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks , 2004 .

[42]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[43]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Towards sustainability in world fisheries , 2002, Nature.

[44]  J. Sutinen.  What works well and why: evidence from fishery-management experiences in OECD countries , 1999 .

[45]  Christopher M. Dewees.  EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL QUOTA SYSTEMS ON NEW ZEALAND AND BRITISH COLUMBIA FISHERIES , 1998 .

[46]  R. Fujita,et al.  INNOVATIVE APPROACHES FOR FOSTERING CONSERVATION MARINE FISHERIES , 1998 .

[47]  T. Parsons,et al.  Scaling Fisheries: the science of measuring the effects of fishing, 1855–1955 , 1995 .

[48]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Harvesting regulation under quota management systems for ocean fisheries : Decision making in the face of natural variability, weak information, risks and conflicting incentives , 1992 .

[49]  D. Pan.  Wishing For More , 1988, Telos.

[50]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[51]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .