Multiple biomarkers at admission are associated with angiographic, electrocardiographic, and imaging cardiovascular mechanistic markers of outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Damman | P. Woudstra | J. Tijssen | R. D. de Winter | M. Krucoff | K. Koch | J. V. van Straalen | Youlan L. Gu | J. Fischer | J. Haeck | W. Kuijt
[1] P. Damman,et al. MULTIPLE BIOMARKERS AT ADMISSION SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE PREDICTION OF MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 2013 .
[2] G. Stone,et al. Impact of bivalirudin therapy in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1-year results from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[3] R. Jaffe,et al. Prevention and treatment of microvascular obstruction-related myocardial injury and coronary no-reflow following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic approach. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[4] J. Tijssen,et al. Comparison of the usefulness of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide to other serum biomarkers as an early predictor of ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.
[5] J. Tijssen,et al. Comparison of usefulness of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as an independent predictor of cardiac function among admission cardiac serum biomarkers in patients with anterior wall versus nonanterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary int , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.
[6] G. Stone,et al. QUANTIFICATION OF AMPLITUDE, SPEED AND COMPLETENESS OF ST-SEGMENT RECOVERY AFTER PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: WHAT IS THE “BEST ST” RECOVERY TO PREDICT CLINICAL OUTCOME? , 2010 .
[7] R. Kim,et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] W. J. Rohling,et al. Infarct size and left ventricular function in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial infarction and Resolution of ST-segment Elevation (PREPARE) trial: ancillary cardiovascular magnetic resonance study , 2009, Heart.
[9] J. Tijssen,et al. Randomized comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with combined proximal embolic protection and thrombus aspiration versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention alone in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the PREPARE (PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial in , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[10] P. Raskin,et al. Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. , 2008, Circulation.
[11] M. Sabatine,et al. Association of blood glucose with angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the CLARITY-TIMI-28 study). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.
[12] Jong Chun Park,et al. Usefulness of preprocedural N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in predicting angiographic no-reflow phenomenon during stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.
[13] E. Antman,et al. The impact of renal dysfunction on outcomes in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] K. Eagle,et al. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. , 2007, JAMA.
[15] Albert Schömig,et al. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. , 2004, Circulation.
[16] Felix Zijlstra,et al. Angiographic Assessment of Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Myocardial Blush Grade , 2003, Circulation.
[17] George Dangas,et al. Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] Salim Yusuf,et al. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] H. Suryapranata,et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 1998, Circulation.
[20] D. DeMets,et al. Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[21] K. Wegscheider,et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] R. Califf,et al. Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.