Hindsight bias and causal attribution: A causal model theory of creeping determinism.

Hindsight bias describes characteristic changes in the perceptions of events or facts once their outcomes are known. This article focuses on one important facet of this, named creeping determinism, denoting enhanced hindsight perceptions of the inevitability of event outcomes. We suggest a systematic link between the literatures on causal attribution and hindsight bias/creeping determinism and introduce a comprehensive causal model theory (CMT) of creeping determinism. We then distinguish between two alternative versions of CMT, which reflect recent debates in the causal attribution literature. These versions assume, respectively, that individuals make causal attributions by means of covariation analysis or via the discovery of some underlying mechanism. In order to contrast these assumptions, we introduce a new hypothesis concerning the magnitude of creeping determinism, based on the conjunction effect in causal attribution, and we present empirical evidence concerning this hypothesis.

[1]  A. Garnham,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning , 1994 .

[2]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  COVARIATION AND CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION - A LOGICAL MODEL OF THE INTUITIVE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1987 .

[3]  H. Blank,et al.  Perceiving events as both inevitable and unforeseeable in hindsight: The Leipzig candidacy for the Olympics. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  P. Cheng,et al.  Covariation in natural causal induction. , 1992 .

[5]  J. Payne,et al.  Juror Judgments in Civil Cases: Hindsight Effects on Judgments of Liability for Punitive Damages , 1999 .

[6]  T. Louie.  Hindsight Bias and Outcome-Consistent Thoughts when Observing and Making Service Provider Decisions. , 2005 .

[7]  Gernot von Collani,et al.  Hindsight bias, conjunctive explanations and causal attribution. , 2008 .

[8]  S. Mellor,et al.  Effect of self-relevance of an event on hindsight bias: The foreseeability of a layoff. , 1991 .

[9]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Hindsight and Causality , 1991 .

[10]  D. Schopflocher,et al.  Instigation of Attribution Processes by Attributional Questions , 1978 .

[11]  D. Hilton.  Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[12]  Steffen Nestler,et al.  COGNITIVE PROCESS MODELS OF HINDSIGHT BIAS , 2007 .

[13]  D. Hilton.  Mental Models and Causal Explanation: Judgements of Probable Cause and Explanatory Relevance , 1996 .

[14]  C. Anderson.  Attributions as Decisions: A Two Stage Information Processing Model , 1991 .

[15]  R. Abelson,et al.  Conjunctive explanations of success and failure: The effect of different types of causes. , 1989 .

[16]  Impression valence constrains social explanations: the case of discounting versus conjunction effects. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  W. Ahn,et al.  Causal Attribution as a Search for Underlying Mechanisms: An Explanation of the Conjunction Fallacy and the Discounting Principle , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  N. Roese,et al.  Perceptions of Purple: Counterfactual and Hindsight Judgments at Northwestern Wildcats Football Games , 1997 .

[19]  Steffen Nestler,et al.  How many hindsight biases are there? , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  Steffen Nestler,et al.  Hindsight bias doesn't always come easy: causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  S. Nestler,et al.  Hindsight bias and the activation of counterfactual mind-sets. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[22]  R. Pohl,et al.  SARA: A cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias , 2003, Memory.

[23]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution , 1995, Cognition.

[24]  Linda L. Carli.  Cognitive Reconstruction, Hindsight, and Reactions to Victims and Perpetrators , 1999 .

[25]  R. Hastie,et al.  Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. , 1990 .

[26]  M. Pezzo,et al.  Surprise, defence, or making sense: What removes hindsight bias? , 2003, Memory.

[27]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[29]  B. Weiner,et al.  Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985 .

[30]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Conjunctive explanations: When two reasons are better than one. , 1984 .

[31]  R. Agans,et al.  The Hindsight Bias: The Role of the Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk , 1994 .

[32]  B. Malle.  How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction , 2004 .

[33]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[34]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. , 1990 .

[35]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .

[36]  D. Schkade,et al.  Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias , 1991 .

[37]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The Strength of Conjunctive Explanations , 1987 .

[38]  J. McClure.  Goal-based Explanations of Actions and Outcomes , 2002 .

[39]  James M. Olson,et al.  Counterfactuals, Causal Attributions, and the Hindsight Bias: A Conceptual Integration , 1996 .

[40]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Comparison Processes in Hindsight and Causal Attribution , 1995 .

[41]  R. Pohl,et al.  HINDSIGHT BIAS: ON BEING WISE AFTER THE EVENT , 2007 .

[42]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises. , 1977 .

[43]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .