Post-it notes: supporting teachers in authoring vocabulary game contents

In this work, we present Post-it Notes, a system for supporting vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language for primary school children. The system consists of an authoring tool designed for teachers and a mobile application for students. The authoring tool is a web application for creating language learning materials. It supports inserting terms, each one defining a specific meaning of a word, specifying their syntax, definition, phonetics, pronunciation and descriptive image. The correspondences between terms represent translations between languages. Furthermore, the authoring tool allows teachers to create stories, organised as a sequence of sentences, including a set of hidden words for reinforcing their usage. Once published, the story is accessible from the mobile application, which assists children in following the plot. The learning game consists of guessing the missing words by taking pictures of augmented objects distributed in the surrounding environment. A similar interface allows the student to rehearse specific term sets, attaching visual markers to real objects. We evaluated the authoring tool with teachers. The results show both good usability and good acceptance. In addition, we also carried out an observational study in a primary school, describing the children’s behaviour in interacting with the mobile application and group dynamics.

[1]  S. Krashen,et al.  The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom , 1983 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[3]  R. Pettersson Gearing Communications to the Cognitive Needs of Students: Findings from Visual Literacy Research , 2004 .

[4]  Tan-Hsu Tan,et al.  QR Code and Augmented Reality-Supported Mobile English Learning System , 2008, WMMP.

[5]  Iulian Radu,et al.  Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[6]  Robert Godwin-Jones,et al.  Smartphones and language learning , 2017 .

[7]  M. Gaffney Enhancing Teachers' Take-up of Digital Content: Factors and Design Principles in Technology Adoption , 2010 .

[8]  Funda Dag,et al.  Evaluation of Educational Authoring Tools for Teachers stressing of Perceived Usability Features , 2014 .

[9]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Pictorial superiority effect. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[10]  Claire J. Kramsch The Multilingual Subject , 2012 .

[11]  T. Murray Design Tradeoffs in Usability and Power for Advanced Educational Software Authoring Tools , 2004 .

[12]  Tom Cobb Second language acquisition: an introductory course , 2010 .

[13]  M. Rafael Salaberry,et al.  The Role of Input and Output Practice in Second Language Acquisition. , 1997 .

[14]  Robert Godwin-Jones Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games , 2016 .

[15]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences , 2005, ACM Trans. Graph..

[16]  M. Irigoyen,et al.  Exposure and Use of Mobile Media Devices by Young Children , 2015, Pediatrics.

[17]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmented Reality in the Classroom , 2012, Computer.

[18]  Dagmar Divjak,et al.  Frequency effects in language learning and processing , 2012 .

[19]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[20]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[21]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences , 2004, UIST '04.

[22]  Nancy Bell,et al.  Learning to Play, Playing to Learn: FL Learners as Multicompetent Language Users , 2007 .

[23]  Emily E. Scida,et al.  Hybrid Courses and Their Impact on Student and Classroom Performance: A Case Study at the University of Virginia. , 2013 .

[24]  Jerrold E. Kemp,et al.  Planning and Producing Instructional Media , 1985 .

[25]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[26]  Greg Kessler,et al.  Technology and the future of language teaching , 2018 .

[27]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[28]  Ming-Kuan Tsai,et al.  Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  One-to-One Technology-Enhanced Learning: an Opportunity for Global Research Collaboration , 2006, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[30]  Sylvester Arnab,et al.  Urban explorations for language learning: a gamified approach to teaching Italian in a university context , 2016 .

[31]  Tan-Hsu Tan,et al.  2D Barcode and Augmented Reality Supported English Learning System , 2007, 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2007).

[32]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[33]  Hyekyeng Kim Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning , 2009 .

[34]  Olga Scrivner,et al.  Augmented reality digital technologies (ARDT) for foreign language teaching and learning , 2016, 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC).

[35]  Stuart MacFarlane,et al.  Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction , 2006, IDC '06.