Hybridisation effect on operating costs and optimal sizing of components for hybrid electric vehicles

Reductions of fuel consumption and gas emissions count among the main advantages of hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). It is well known that the level of hybridisation has a large influence on the fuel consumption, the manufacturing cost and the battery lifetime. Therefore, a proper selection of the size of components could be the result of a trade-off between them. This paper provides models and a methodology to address the sizing of components of a HEV. Specifically the work is focused on the series architecture with internal combustion engine and battery. The sizing criteria are oriented to reduce the operating costs, in which are included the fuel consumption and the battery-life consumption. Finally, the methodology proposed is applied in a case study. It corresponds to a real hybrid electric bus operating under urban driving conditions. Simulation results show that the best solutions are obtained by oversizing the battery with respect to power requirements.

[1]  Megan Beardsley,et al.  Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling , 1998 .

[2]  Mauro G. Carignano,et al.  Sizing and performance analysis of battery pack in electric vehicles , 2014, 2014 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON).

[3]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Improvement of an EVT-Based HEV Using Dynamic Programming , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Tao Tang,et al.  Optimisation of recommended speed profile for train operation based on ant colony algorithm , 2016, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[5]  Donald E. Kirk,et al.  Optimal control theory : an introduction , 1970 .

[6]  B. Nykvist,et al.  Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles , 2015 .

[7]  R. H. Staunton,et al.  Evaluation of 2004 Toyota Prius Hybrid Electric Drive System , 2004 .

[8]  Tyler Gray,et al.  2010 Toyota Prius VIN 0462 Hybrid Electric Vehicle Battery Test Results , 2013 .

[9]  Guillermo R. Bossio,et al.  Optimization of power management in an hybrid electric vehicle using dynamic programming , 2006, Math. Comput. Simul..

[10]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Vehicle Propulsion Systems , 2013 .

[11]  J. Gover,et al.  Optimizing the Hybridization Factor for a Parallel Hybrid Electric Small Car , 2006, 2006 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[12]  Srdjan M. Lukic,et al.  Effects of drivetrain hybridization on fuel economy and dynamic performance of parallel hybrid electric vehicles , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  K. B. Wipke,et al.  ADVISOR 2.1: a user-friendly advanced powertrain simulation using a combined backward/forward approach , 1999 .

[14]  Roberto Capata,et al.  Procedure for the Design of a Hybrid-Series Vehicle and the Hybridization Degree Choice , 2010 .

[15]  Selin Soner Kara,et al.  Simulation-based fleet scheduling in the Metrobus , 2016, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[16]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  A control benchmark on the energy management of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle , 2014 .

[17]  Chee Wei Tan,et al.  A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles , 2013 .

[18]  Fang Cao,et al.  Energy optimisation of single train operation based on tabu search , 2016, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[19]  Srdjan M. Lukic,et al.  Energy Storage Systems for Automotive Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Ching Chuen Chan,et al.  Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel-Cell Vehicles: Architectures and Modeling , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  Simona Onori,et al.  Optimal energy management of hybrid electric vehicles including battery aging , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[22]  Keith Wipke,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE FUEL ECONOMY BENEFIT OF DRIVETRAIN HYBRIDIZATION , 1997 .

[23]  Tony Markel,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology , 2007 .