Clinical decision making based on radionuclide determined ejection fraction in oncology patients.

UNLABELLED Decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a relative contraindication for the use of potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy. A resting LVEF of 50% is usually used as the lower limit of normal values. The decision to change chemotherapy, however, is complex and is affected by many factors, including ejection fraction. METHODS To determine how LVEF data were used by clinical oncologists in clinical decision making, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients referred for ejection fraction measurements from the hematology/oncology divisionS of Stanford University from March 1992 through March 1995. The records of 565 patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy were evaluated. RESULTS LVEFs < 50% were found in 153 patients. The charts of patients with reduced ejection fractions were reviewed to determine if the radionuclide measurement resulted in either discontinuation of the cardiotoxic agent or substitution of a less cardiotoxic drug or mode of administration. These specific changes in therapy occurred in only 43 of the 153 (28%) patients with ejection fractions below 50%; 24 of the 43 (57%) had ejection fractions < or = 40%. Patients with lower ejection fraction values were more likely to have their therapy changed than those with LVEFs close to normal. Patients with ejection fractions < or = 30 generally had cardiotoxic agents discontinued. Of patients who had a resting LVEF < 50% and whose therapy was not changed, 81% had a normal increase in LVEF with exercise. CONCLUSION In clinical practice at our institution, ejection fraction < 50% is not used as an absolute contraindication to cardiotoxic chemotherapy. When the LVEF is less than 40%, potentially cardiotoxic therapy is most often discontinued or omitted. Radionuclide evidence of cardiac reserve may account for decisions to continue cardiotoxic agents despite ejection fractions < 50% in the majority of patients. Further study will be needed to establish standard criteria. Reserve function, as measured by the change in ejection fraction from rest to stress may be an important parameter used by oncologists to help select patients for continued therapy in spite of a reduced ejection fraction. Our results argue that use of fixed criteria may be too restrictive.

[1]  F M Muggia,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin: antitumor activity and unique toxicities during two complementary phase I studies. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  P. Singal,et al.  Probucol protects against adriamycin cardiomyopathy without interfering with its antitumor effect. , 1995, Circulation.

[3]  M. Clausen,et al.  Cardiac toxicity of bone marrow transplantation: predictive value of cardiologic evaluation before transplant. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Doroshow,et al.  High‐dose doxorubicin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide with stem cell reinfusion in patients with metastatic or high‐risk primary breast cancer , 1994, Cancer.

[5]  B. Uziely,et al.  Protracted drug infusions in cancer treatment: an appraisal of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and platinums. , 1993, Annals of Oncology.

[6]  I. Carrió,et al.  Myocyte cell damage after administration of doxorubicin or mitoxantrone in breast cancer patients assessed by indium 111 antimyosin monoclonal antibody studies. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  R. Perez-soler,et al.  Liposomes in the treatment of malignancy: a clinical perspective. , 1992, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[8]  M. Bauch,et al.  Atrial natriuretic peptide as a marker for doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxic effects , 1992, Cancer.

[9]  V. Ferrans,et al.  ICRF-187 permits longer treatment with doxorubicin in women with breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  P. Dombernowsky,et al.  Epirubicin cardiotoxicity: a study of 135 patients with advanced breast cancer. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  E. Monti,et al.  Effect of angiotensin II on the antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin. , 1990, Cancer letters.

[12]  P. Hekali,et al.  Cardiac involvement in bone marrow transplantation: electrocardiographic changes, arrhythmias, heart failure and autopsy findings. , 1990, Bone marrow transplantation.

[13]  F. Crippa,et al.  Evaluation of ventricular function by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography in patients treated with mitoxantrone. , 1989, Drugs under experimental and clinical research.

[14]  C. Haanen,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Doxorubicin , 1988, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[15]  J. Smyth,et al.  Cardiotoxicity of mitozantrone assessed by stress and resting nuclear ventriculography. , 1988, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[16]  P. Sager,et al.  Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction complicating doxorubicin therapy. Seven-year experience using serial radionuclide angiocardiography. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Cyclophosphamide cardiotoxicity: an analysis of dosing as a risk factor. , 1986, Blood.

[18]  R. Kerber,et al.  Effect of high-dose cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation on left ventricular function in adult patients with leukemia undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[19]  R. Bonow,et al.  Prospective evaluation of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity by rest and exercise radionuclide angiography. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Mitoxantrone: a new anticancer drug with significant clinical activity. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  Cross Rj Clinical safety and tolerance of mitoxantrone. , 1984 .

[22]  C. Mansfield,et al.  Ultrastructural evidence of cardiac damage resulting from thoracic irradiation and anthracyclines in the rat. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  J. Srigley,et al.  Radionuclide angiography and endomyocardial biopsy in the assessment of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. , 1981, Cancer.

[24]  R. Crossley Clinical safety and tolerance of mitoxantrone. , 1984, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  M. Goris,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of radionuclide ejection fractions in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. , 1983, American heart journal.

[26]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Doxorubicin (adriamycin) cardiomyopathy. , 1983, The Western journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Ozols,et al.  The anthracycline antineoplastic drugs. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[29]  L. Goldman,et al.  Serial assessment of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  R. Slavin,et al.  The use of cyclophosphamide for clinical marrow transplantation. , 1972, Transplantation proceedings.

[31]  P. Neiman,et al.  High‐dose cyclophosphamide therapy for malignant disease. Toxicity, tumor response, and the effects of stored autologous marrow , 1972 .