The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI

The anterior cingulate cortex has been activated by color Stroop tasks, supporting the hypothesis that it is recruited to mediate response selection or allocate attentional resources when confronted with competing information‐processing streams. The current study used the newly developed “Counting Stroop” to identify the mediating neural substrate of cognitive interference. The Counting Stroop, a Stroop variant allowing on‐line response time measurements while obviating speech, was created because speaking produces head movements that can exceed those tolerated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), preventing the collection of vital performance data. During this task, subjects report by button‐press the number of words (1–4) on the screen, regardless of word meaning. Interference trials contain number words that are incongruent with the correct response (e.g., “two” written three times), while neutral trials contain single semantic category common animals (e.g., “bird”). Nine normal right‐handed adult volunteers underwent fMRI while performing the Counting Stroop. Group fMRI data revealed significant (P ≤ 10‐4) activity in the cognitive division of anterior cingulate cortex when contrasting the interference vs. neutral conditions. On‐line performance data showed 1) longer reaction times for interference blocks than for neutral ones, and 2) decreasing reaction times with practice during interference trials (diminished interference effects), indicating that learning occurred. The performance data proved to be a useful guide in analyzing the image data. The relative difference in anterior cingulate activity between the interference and neutral conditions decreased as subjects learned the task. These findings have ramifications for attentional, cognitive interference, learning, and motor control mechanism theories. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:270–282, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  John F. Santos,et al.  Stability of Performance on the Color-Word Test , 1962, Perceptual and Motor Skills.

[2]  A. Jensen,et al.  Scoring the Stroop test. , 1965, Acta psychologica.

[3]  A. Jensen,et al.  The Stroop color-word test: a review. , 1966, Acta psychologica.

[4]  J. Windes,et al.  Reaction time for numerical coding and naming of numerals. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  B. Gholson,et al.  Choice reaction times to hues printed in conflicting hue names and nonsense words. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Morton,et al.  Categories of interference: verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[7]  Benjamin W. White,et al.  Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names , 1969 .

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  The Stroop Test: Selective Attention to Colours and Words , 1969, Nature.

[9]  Ronald E. Shor,et al.  Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity , 1971 .

[10]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  R. Shor,et al.  Symbol Processing Speed Differences and Symbol Interference Effects in a Variety of Concept Domains. , 1971, The Journal of general psychology.

[12]  R. Shor,et al.  Effect of practice on a Stroop-like spatial directions task , 1972 .

[13]  F N Dyer,et al.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Gudmund J. W. Smith,et al.  The validity of the serial color-word test A reply to Lennart Sjöberg , 1974 .

[15]  C. Golden Sex Differences in Performance on the Stroop Color and Word Test , 1974 .

[16]  Colette Ray,et al.  The manipulation of color response times in a color-word interference task , 1974 .

[17]  G. D. Nielsen The locus and mechanism of the Stroop color word effect. , 1974 .

[18]  Charles J. Golden Effect of Differing Number of Colors on the Stroop Color and Word Test , 1974 .

[19]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Stroop Effect: Interference and Facilitation with Verbal and Manual Responses , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[21]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  The effects of amount of information in the Stroop color word test , 1977 .

[22]  U. Hentschel,et al.  Improved reliability estimates for the serial color‐word test , 1978 .

[23]  J. L. Warner,et al.  Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information , 1979 .

[24]  Chicako Ogura Formation of learning-set in the task of Stroop Color-Word Test. , 1980 .

[25]  J. Baron,et al.  Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Effects of motor and verbal practice on the Stroop task. , 1980, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Lucinda Mcclain,et al.  Effects of Response Type and Set Size on Stroop Color-Word Performance , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  Edith Mägiste,et al.  Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals. , 1984 .

[29]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Semantic priming and Stroop-like interference in word-naming tasks. , 1985 .

[30]  J. Adams Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[31]  D. Pandya,et al.  Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  P. Goldman-Rakic Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[35]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[36]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[40]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  C. Colby The neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of attention. , 1991, Journal of child neurology.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A PET study of word finding , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Ultra-fast imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Motor practice and neurophysiological adaptation in the cerebellum: a positron tomography study , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  C. Olson,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[48]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  F. Benes Relationship of Cingulate Cortex to Schizophrenia and Other Psychiatric Disorders , 1993 .

[50]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Prefrontal connections of medial motor areas in the rhesus monkey , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  M. Gabriel,et al.  Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook , 1993 .

[52]  Brent A. Vogt,et al.  Structural Organization of Cingulate Cortex: Areas, Neurons, and Somatodendritic Transmitter Receptors , 1993 .

[53]  P. Strick,et al.  Cingulate Motor Areas , 1993 .

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[58]  M. Ron,et al.  Effects of practice of serial tests of attention in healthy subjects. , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[59]  M. Posner,et al.  Attentional networks , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[60]  N. Alpert,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow measured during symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder using oxygen 15-labeled carbon dioxide and positron emission tomography. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.

[61]  W. Rogers,et al.  Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[63]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[65]  B. Vogt,et al.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Motion detection and correction in functional MR imaging , 1995 .

[67]  N. Alpert,et al.  A positron emission tomographic study of simple phobic symptom provocation. , 1995, Archives of general psychiatry.

[68]  K. Kwong Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. , 1995, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[69]  R. Knight,et al.  Role of prefrontal cortex in generation of the contingent negative variation. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Automated shimming at 1.5 t using echo‐planar image frequency maps , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[71]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[72]  N. Alpert,et al.  A symptom provocation study of posttraumatic stress disorder using positron emission tomography and script-driven imagery. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[73]  Morphologic region analysis of statistical parameter maps in fMRI , 1996, NeuroImage.

[74]  G. Bush,et al.  An automated system for localization and characterization of functional MRI activations in four dimensions , 1996, NeuroImage.

[75]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anticipation causes increased blood flow to the anterior cingulate cortex , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[76]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection — a PET study in man , 1996, Brain Research.

[77]  S E Petersen,et al.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[79]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  A pediatric functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task , 1996, NeuroImage.

[80]  L. Fasotti,et al.  Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[81]  T A Ketter,et al.  Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[82]  M S Mega,et al.  The limbic system: an anatomic, phylogenetic, and clinical perspective. , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[83]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A Developmental Functional MRI Study of Prefrontal Activation during Performance of a Go-No-Go Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[84]  H. Mayberg Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression. , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[85]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Time Course of Activating Brain Areas in Generating Verbal Associations , 1997 .

[86]  M. Raichle,et al.  Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders , 1997, Nature.

[87]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[88]  George Bush,et al.  The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[89]  B. Vogt,et al.  Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.