Atomic-level simulations of seeman DNA nanostructures: the paranemic crossover in salt solution.

We use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to understand the structure and stability of various paranemic crossover (PX) DNA molecules, synthesized recently by Seeman and co-workers at New York University. These studies include all atoms of the PX structures with an explicit description of solvent and ions. The average dynamics structures over the last 1 ns of the 3-ns simulation preserve the Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding as well as the helical structure. The root mean-square deviation in coordinates with respect to the MD averaged structure converges to 2-3 A for PX55, PX65, and PX85, but for PX75 and PX95 the root mean-square deviation in coordinates exhibits large fluctuations, indicating an intrinsic instability. The PX structures are structurally more rigid compared to the canonical B-DNA without crossover. We have developed a strain energy analysis method based on the nearest-neighbor interaction and computed the strain energy for the PX molecules compared to the B-DNA molecules of the same length and sequence. PX65 has the lowest calculated strain energy (approximately -0.77 kcal/mol/bp), and the strain increases dramatically for PX75, PX85, and PX95. PX55 has the highest strain energy (approximately 1.85 kcal/mol/bp) making it unstable, which is in accordance with the experimental results. We find that PX65 has helical twist and other helical structural parameters close to the values for normal B-DNA of similar length and sequence. Vibrational mode analysis shows that compared to other PX motifs, PX65 has the smallest population of the low-frequency modes that are dominant contributors for the conformational entropy of the PX DNA structures. All these results indicate that PX65 is structurally more stable compared to other PX motifs, in agreement with experiments. These results should aid in designing optimized DNA structures for use in nanoscale components and devices.

[1]  N. Seeman,et al.  Paranemic crossover DNA: a generalized Holliday structure with applications in nanotechnology. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Prabal K Maiti,et al.  The stability of Seeman JX DNA topoisomers of paranemic crossover (PX) molecules as a function of crossover number. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  William A. Goddard,et al.  The two-phase model for calculating thermodynamic properties of liquids from molecular dynamics: Validation for the phase diagram of Lennard-Jones fluids , 2003 .

[4]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology , 2003, Nature materials.

[5]  Gundula Piechotta,et al.  Electrical biochip technology—a tool for microarrays and continuous monitoring , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[6]  Phiset Sa-Ardyen,et al.  The flexibility of DNA double crossover molecules. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[7]  N. Seeman Biochemistry and structural DNA nanotechnology: an evolving symbiotic relationship. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[8]  Jean-Louis Mergny,et al.  DNA duplex–quadruplex exchange as the basis for a nanomolecular machine , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  N. Seeman DNA in a material world , 2003, Nature.

[10]  John H. Reif,et al.  Molecular Assembly and Computation: From Theory to Experimental Demonstrations , 2002, ICALP.

[11]  Christof M. Niemeyer,et al.  Tools for the Biomolecular Engineer , 2002, Science.

[12]  N. Seeman,et al.  Emulating biology: Building nanostructures from the bottom up , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug‐binding protein QacR , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[14]  N. Seeman,et al.  A robust DNA mechanical device controlled by hybridization topology , 2002, Nature.

[15]  C. Niemeyer Nanotechnology. Tools for the biomolecular engineer. , 2002, Science.

[16]  N. Seeman DNA Nicks and Nodes and Nanotechnology , 2001 .

[17]  J. Reif,et al.  Logical computation using algorithmic self-assembly of DNA triple-crossover molecules , 2000, Nature.

[18]  T Schlick,et al.  A-Tract bending: insights into experimental structures by computational models. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Joseph Wang SURVEY AND SUMMARY From DNA biosensors to gene chips , 2000 .

[20]  Shi V. Liu Debating controversies can enhance creativity , 2000, Nature.

[21]  J. Reif,et al.  Construction, analysis, ligation, and self-assembly of DNA triple crossover complexes , 2000 .

[22]  L. Li,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the d(CCAACGTTGG)(2) decamer: influence of the crystal environment. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Lloyd M. Smith,et al.  DNA computing on surfaces , 2000, Nature.

[24]  J Wang,et al.  From DNA biosensors to gene chips. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  N. Seeman,et al.  Designed Two-Dimensional DNA Holliday Junction Arrays Visualized by Atomic Force Microscopy , 1999 .

[26]  P. Kollman,et al.  A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat. , 1999, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[27]  D. Beveridge,et al.  Molecular dynamics studies of axis bending in d(G5-(GA4T4C)2-C5) and d(G5-(GT4A4C)2-C5): effects of sequence polarity on DNA curvature. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  D. Turner,et al.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[29]  Bhyravabhotla Jayaram,et al.  Local dielectric environment of B-DNA in solution : Results from a 14 ns molecular dynamics trajectory , 1998 .

[30]  D. Beveridge,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of an oligonucleotide duplex with adenine tracts phased by a full helix turn. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[32]  M Feig,et al.  Structural equilibrium of DNA represented with different force fields. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[33]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  P A Kollman,et al.  Molecular dynamics and continuum solvent studies of the stability of polyG-polyC and polyA-polyT DNA duplexes in solution. , 1998, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[35]  N. Seeman DNA nanotechnology: novel DNA constructions. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[36]  GC rich DNA oligonucleotides with narrow minor groove width , 1997, FEBS letters.

[37]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations highlight the structural differences among DNA: DNA, RNA:RNA, and DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes , 1997 .

[38]  R. Osman,et al.  Computational Simulations of DNA Distortions by a cis,syn-Cyclobutane Thymine Dimer Lesion† , 1996 .

[39]  N. Seeman,et al.  Antiparallel DNA Double Crossover Molecules As Components for Nanoconstruction , 1996 .

[40]  P A Kollman,et al.  Observation of the A-DNA to B-DNA transition during unrestrained molecular dynamics in aqueous solution. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  E Westhof,et al.  Calculations of nucleic acid conformations. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  Improved nearest-neighbor parameters for predicting DNA duplex stability. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[43]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[44]  T. Darden,et al.  Accurate crystal molecular dynamics simulations using particle-mesh-Ewald: RNA dinucleotides — ApU and GpC , 1995 .

[45]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[46]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  B-DNA twisting correlates with base-pair morphology. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  T. Darden,et al.  Toward the Accurate Modeling of DNA: The Importance of Long-Range Electrostatics , 1995 .

[48]  Erik Winfree,et al.  On the computational power of DNA annealing and ligation , 1995, DNA Based Computers.

[49]  C. S. Tung,et al.  Nucleic acid modeling tool (NAMOT): an interactive graphic tool for modeling nucleic acid structures , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[50]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[51]  N. Seeman,et al.  DNA double-crossover molecules. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[52]  N. Boutonnet,et al.  Looking into the grooves of DNA , 1993, Biopolymers.

[53]  R. Lavery,et al.  Defining the structure of irregular nucleic acids: conventions and principles. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[54]  M. Price,et al.  Use of the hydroxyl radical and gel electrophoresis to study DNA structure , 1989, Electrophoresis.

[55]  R Lavery,et al.  The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[56]  A. Klug,et al.  The structure of an oligo(dA)·oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications , 1987, Nature.

[57]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[58]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[59]  Kent R. Wilson,et al.  Thermodynamics and quantum corrections from molecular dynamics for liquid water , 1982 .

[60]  Robin Milner,et al.  On Observing Nondeterminism and Concurrency , 1980, ICALP.

[61]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[62]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.