Evaluating the effects of node cooperation on DTN routing

Abstract Due to the uncertainty of transmission opportunities between mobile nodes, delay tolerant networks (DTN) routing exploits the opportunistic forwarding mechanism. This mechanism requires nodes to forward messages in a cooperative way. However, in the real word, most of the nodes exhibit non-cooperation behaviors such as dropping and not relaying messages. In this letter, we investigate the problem of how the non-cooperation behaviors of nodes influence the performance of DTN routing algorithms of two-hop relay and epidemic routing. First, we model the message delivery process with non-cooperation behaviors by a two dimensional continuous time Markov chain. Then, we obtain the system performance of message delivery delay and delivery cost by explicit expressions. Numerical results show that different non-cooperation behaviors may have opposite impacts on different routing algorithms. Specifically, dropping message increases the message delivery delay and delivery cost in the two-hop relay, while increases the delay but does not affect the delivery cost in the epidemic routing, and not relaying message increases the delivery delay but decreases the delivery cost for both the two-hop and epidemic routing.

[1]  Jing Zhao,et al.  VADD: Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[2]  Ioannis Stavrakakis,et al.  On the Effects of Cooperation in DTNs , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware.

[3]  Kevin R. Fall,et al.  A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[4]  Injong Rhee,et al.  Max-Contribution: On Optimal Resource Allocation in Delay Tolerant Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Decentralized Stochastic Control of Delay Tolerant Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[6]  Paolo Santi,et al.  The Effects of Node Cooperation Level on Routing Performance in Delay Tolerant Networks , 2009, 2009 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[7]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[8]  Ger Koole,et al.  The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, Perform. Evaluation.

[9]  Minglu Li,et al.  Recognizing Exponential Inter-Contact Time in VANETs , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Incentive-aware routing in DTNs , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[11]  Merkourios Karaliopoulos,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of DTN data relaying schemes to node selfishness , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  Qinghua Li,et al.  Routing in Socially Selfish Delay Tolerant Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  DTN: an architectural retrospective , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Qinghua Li,et al.  Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: a social network perspective , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[15]  Vinton G. Cerf,et al.  Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary Internet , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..