Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals

In three cross-over experiments, we examined the effect on energy intake of changing the size of the plate used at a meal. On separate days, adults were served the same lunch menu but were given a different-sized plate. In the first study, 45 participants used each of three plate sizes (17, 22, or 26 cm) and served the main course from a large dish. In the second study, 30 participants received an equal amount of food presented on each of the two larger plates. In the third study, 44 participants used each of the three plates and selected from a buffet of five foods matched for energy density. Results showed that plate size had no significant effect on energy intake. The mean differences in intake using the smallest and largest plates in the three studies were 21+/-13 g, 11+/-13 g, and 4+/-18 g, respectively, equivalent to <142 kJ (34 kcal) and not significantly different from zero. Participants in the third study made significantly more trips to the buffet when they were given the smallest plate. These findings show that using a smaller plate did not lead to a reduction in food intake at meals eaten in the laboratory.

[1]  B. Rolls,et al.  Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. , 2006, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[2]  W. Zung Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and Depression Status Inventory , 1986 .

[3]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Energy density, palatability, and satiety: implications for weight control. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[4]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  F. Toates,et al.  Feeding and drinking , 1987 .

[6]  B. Rolls,et al.  The role of energy density in the overconsumption of fat. , 2000, The Journal of nutrition.

[7]  B. Rolls,et al.  Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  Annie S. Anderson,et al.  Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others , 2006, Physiology & Behavior.

[9]  J. Brunstrom,et al.  Effects of distraction on the development of satiety. , 2006, The British journal of nutrition.

[10]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[11]  Marion Nestle,et al.  Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[12]  J. A. Yuhas,et al.  The impact of training, food type, gender, and container size on the estimation of food portion sizes. , 1989, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[13]  D. Garner,et al.  The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates , 1982, Psychological Medicine.

[14]  B. Wansink Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. , 2004, Annual review of nutrition.

[15]  B. Rolls,et al.  Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. , 2004, Obesity research.

[16]  D. Levitsky,et al.  The more food young adults are served, the more they overeat. , 2004, The Journal of nutrition.

[17]  B. Rolls,et al.  Chefs’ Opinions of Restaurant Portion Sizes , 2007, Obesity.

[18]  J. Polivy,et al.  Normative influences on food intake , 2005, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  Bolland Je,et al.  The impact of training, food type, gender, and container size on the estimation of food portion sizes. , 1989 .

[20]  B. Rolls,et al.  The Effect of Large Portion Sizes on Energy Intake Is Sustained for 11 Days , 2007, Obesity.

[21]  Julia A. Ello-Martin,et al.  Portion sizes and the obesity epidemic. , 2011, The Journal of nutrition.

[22]  B. Wansink,et al.  Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.