Evaluating climate change pathways through a building's lifecycle based on Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract Climate change impact of a building was evaluated through a Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (DLCA) methodology with the aim at demonstrating the feasibility of DLCA and the usefulness of such approach in the building sector. The methodology uses dynamic thermal simulation for energy consumption, databases for the building sector, a new developed database for temporal parameters of buildings, DyPLCA tool for dynamic LCI calculation. Clime change indicators were obtained in function of time for 500 years time span: radiative forcing, cumulated radiative forcing and global mean temperature change. Results revealed that each building component has its own climate footprint from which mitigation actions can be deduced. Results should always be placed in the climate context, in this case, the critical period 2030–2050, a turning point for limiting the temperature increase at 1.5 °C, with an objective of zero net emission beyond 2050. Dynamic indicators are well adapted for accounting the effect of biogenic CO2 and can be used to simulate strategies for GHGs neutralization. The main outcome of the comparison DLCA – LCA is that the results can be greatly different, especially when biogenic carbon is present (case of bio-based materials): i) the ranking and proportion of the contributors can change according to the time horizon for a given dynamic indicator (cumulative radiative forcing and global mean temperature change), ii) the ranking and proportion of the contributors can be different between the considered indicators, demonstrating the need of a more detailed assessment in the context of the imminent climate target.

[1]  Miko U. F. Kirschbaum.  Climate-change impact potentials as an alternative to global warming potentials , 2014 .

[2]  M. D. Mainar-Toledo,et al.  Sustainability of non-residential buildings and relevance of main environmental impact contributors' variability. A case study of food retail stores buildings , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[3]  Xiaocun Zhang,et al.  Analysis of embodied carbon in the building life cycle considering the temporal perspectives of emissions: A case study in China , 2017 .

[4]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Time‐dependent climate impact of a bioenergy system – methodology development and application to Swedish conditions , 2013 .

[5]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[6]  Alexandra Lebert,et al.  An operational methodology for applying dynamic Life Cycle Assessment to buildings , 2018, Building and Environment.

[7]  S. Lasvaux.  Étude d'un modèle simplifié pour l'analyse de cycle de vie des bâtiments , 2010 .

[8]  Wen-Shao Chang,et al.  Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches , 2018, Sustainability.

[9]  D. Vuarnoz,et al.  Integrating hourly life-cycle energy and carbon emissions of energy supply in buildings , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[10]  Cordella Mauro,et al.  Level(s) – A common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings: Parts 1 and 2: Introduction to Level(s) and how it works (Beta v1.0) , 2017 .

[11]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of the use stage of buildings using dynamic high-resolution energy consumption and data on grid composition , 2019, Building and Environment.

[12]  Patrick Schalbart,et al.  Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts , 2016 .

[13]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[14]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Bart Muys,et al.  Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic Life Cycle Assessment. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  W. O. Collinge,et al.  Dynamic Life Cycle Assessments of a Conventional Green Building and a Net Zero Energy Building: Exploration of Static, Dynamic, Attributional, and Consequential Electricity Grid Models. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Assessment of the actual hygrothermal performance of glass mineral wool insulation applied 25 years ago in masonry cavity walls , 2014 .

[18]  Jung-Ho Huh,et al.  A Study on Variation of Thermal Characteristics of Insulation Materials for Buildings According to Actual Long-Term Annual Aging Variation , 2017 .

[19]  Ligia Tiruta-Barna,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of temporal parameters in a dynamic LCA framework. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  M. Margni,et al.  Implementing a Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment Methodology with a Case Study on Domestic Hot Water Production , 2017 .

[22]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .

[23]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Dynamic LCA framework for environmental impact assessment of buildings , 2017 .

[24]  Ligia Tiruta-Barna,et al.  Operational integration of time dependent toxicity impact category in dynamic LCA. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  G. Peters,et al.  Policy Update: Multicomponent climate policy: why do emission metrics matter? , 2010 .

[26]  Ligia Tiruta-Barna,et al.  Environmental assessment of bioenergy production from microalgae based systems , 2016 .

[27]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[28]  Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre,et al.  The ESPA (Enhanced Structural Path Analysis) method: a solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Patrick Schalbart,et al.  Accounting for temporal variation of electricity production and consumption in the LCA of an energy-efficient house , 2016 .

[31]  Ligia Tiruta-Barna,et al.  Framework and computational tool for the consideration of time dependency in Life Cycle Inventory: proof of concept , 2016 .

[32]  Subhrajit Guhathakurta,et al.  Functional unit, technological dynamics, and scaling properties for the life cycle energy of residences. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Marine Fouquet,et al.  Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment , 2015 .

[34]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Temporal differentiation of background systems in LCA: relevance of adding temporal information in LCI databases , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Patrick Schalbart,et al.  Development of an electricity system model allowing dynamic and marginal approaches in LCA—tested in the French context of space heating in buildings , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Yurong Zhang,et al.  Taking the Time Characteristic into Account of Life Cycle Assessment: Method and Application for Buildings , 2017 .