The comparison of PCA and discrete rough set for feature extraction of remote sensing image classification – A case study on rice classification, Taiwan

Texture information offers an extensive solution for image classification by providing better accuracy of image information. However, huge amounts of improper additional texture information may result in a chaotic state, and this leads to uncertainty in the classification process. Considerable portion of earlier works have been carried out through the generally acknowledged procedure of Principal Components Analysis (PCA). However, the PCA method has flaws in the area of influenced and non- influenced attributes. On the whole, whether PCA provides an effective solution to determine the value of knowledge rule in image information still remains a question. This study proposes an innovative method, called Discrete Rough Set method, as a tool for image classification. This study focuses on two crucial issues: (1) The core attributes of the target categories in image classification are systematically analyzed while eliminating surplus attributes rationally; (2) The unique point of each attribute, which influenced the target categories, is successfully found. This is a crucial aspect that is very helpful for the construction of decision rule. Finally, in this study we utilized the expert knowledge classifier and the overall accuracy of Discrete Rough Set (96.67%) exceeds that of the conventional PCA (86.00%) of paddy rice area evaluation from Quickbird image. This result shows that the appropriate classification knowledge can be presented by Discrete Rough Set, and this information can effectively improve the accuracy of image classification.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  P. Sellers Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[3]  K. Clarke Computation of the fractal dimension of topographic surfaces using the triangular prism surface area method , 1985 .

[4]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[5]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[6]  N. Lam Description and measurement of Landsat TM images using fractals , 1990 .

[7]  J. Dubois,et al.  Evaluation Of The Grey-level Co-occurrence Matrix Method For Land-cover Classification Using Spot Imagery , 1990 .

[8]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[9]  James R. Carr,et al.  Application of the semivariogram textural classifier (STC) for vegetation discrimination using SIR-B data of Borneo , 1992 .

[10]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[11]  Sandeep Jaggi,et al.  Implementation and operation of three fractal measurement algorithms for analysis of remote-sensing data , 1993 .

[12]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[13]  D. He,et al.  Evaluation of textural and multipolarization radar features for crop classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Fernando Pellon de Miranda,et al.  The semivariogram in comparison to the co-occurrence matrix for classification of image texture , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Sinh Hoa Nguyen,et al.  Pattern Extraction from Data , 1998, Fundam. Informaticae.

[16]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Rough sets theory , 1999 .

[17]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Genetic feature selection combined with composite fuzzy nearest neighbor classifiers for high-dimensional remote sensing data , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[18]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification , 2000 .

[19]  B. Brisco,et al.  Rice monitoring and production estimation using multitemporal RADARSAT , 2001 .

[20]  Ushio Inoue,et al.  Vegetable green coverage estimation from an airborne hyperspectral image , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[21]  George J. Vachtsevanos,et al.  An application of rough set theory to defect detection of automotive glass , 2002, Math. Comput. Simul..

[22]  Soizik Laguette,et al.  Remote sensing applications for precision agriculture: A learning community approach , 2003 .

[23]  Rob Law,et al.  Incorporating the rough sets theory into travel demand analysis , 2003 .

[24]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Modified Principal Component Analysis (MPCA) for feature selection of hyperspectral imagery , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[25]  M. Beynon,et al.  An illustration of variable precision rough set theory: The gender classification of the European barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[26]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[27]  Lori M. Bruce,et al.  Why principal component analysis is not an appropriate feature extraction method for hyperspectral data , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[28]  Phillip A. Laplante,et al.  A rough set-based approach to handling spatial uncertainty in binary images , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[29]  Jianxi Huang,et al.  An effective field method of crop proportion survey in China based on GVG integrated system , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[30]  M. Diuk-Wasser,et al.  Mapping rice field anopheline breeding habitats in Mali, West Africa, using Landsat ETM+ sensor data , 2004, International journal of remote sensing.

[31]  Changsheng Li,et al.  Mapping paddy rice agriculture in southern China using multi-temporal MODIS images , 2005 .

[32]  Tien-Yin Chou,et al.  Spatial knowledge databases as applied to the detection of changes in urban land use , 2005 .

[33]  Stuart E. Marsh,et al.  Biophysical characterization and management effects on semiarid rangeland observed from Landsat ETM+ data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[34]  De-Shuang Huang,et al.  Using FCMC, FVS, and PCA techniques for feature extraction of multispectral images , 2005, IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett..

[35]  Monica Odlare,et al.  Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for assessment of spatial soil variation in an agricultural field , 2005 .

[36]  Jacob T. Mundt,et al.  Discrimination of hoary cress and determination of its detection limits via hyperspectral image processing and accuracy assessment techniques , 2005 .

[37]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  Comparative Studies on Feature Extraction Methods for Multispectral Remote Sensing Image Classification , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.