Causality from Cz to C3/C4 or between C3 and C4 revealed by granger causality and new causality during motor imagery

Interaction between different brain regions has received wide attention recently. Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular methods to explore causality relationship between different brain regions. In 2011, Hu et. al [1] pointed out shortcomings and/or limitations of GC by using a large of number of illustrative examples and showed that GC is only a causality definition in the sense of Granger and does not reflect real causality at all, and meanwhile proposed a new causality (NC) which is shown to be more reasonable and understandable than GC by those examples. Motor imagery (MI) is an important mental process in cognitive neuroscience and cognitive psychology and has received growing attention for a long time. However, there is few work about causality flow so far during MI based on scalp EEG. In this paper, we use scalp EEG to study causality flow during MI. The scalp EEGs are from 9 subjects in BCI competition IV held in 2008 [2] and provided by Graz University of Technology. We are interested in three regions: Cz (the centre of cerebral cortex), C3 (the left of cerebral cortex) and C4 (the right of cerebral cortex) which are considered to be optimal locations for recognizing MI states in literature. We apply GC and NC to scalp EEG and find that i) there is strong directional connectivity from Cz to C3/C4 during left hand and right hand MI based on GC and NC. ii) During left hand MI, there is directional connectivity from C4 to C3 based on GC and NC. iii) During right hand MI, there is strong directional connectivity from C3 to C4 which is much clearly revealed by NC method than by GC method. iv) Our results suggest that NC method in time and frequency domains is demonstrated to be much better to reveal causal influence between different brain regions than GC method. Thus, we deeply believe that NC method will shed new light on causality analysis in economics and neuroscience.

[1]  Richard Scheines,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, Second Edition , 2000, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[2]  Yi-Chung Hsu,et al.  The impact of American depositary receipts on the Japanese index: Do industry effect and size effect matter? , 2011 .

[3]  N. Wiener,et al.  The prediction theory of multivariate stochastic processes , 1957 .

[4]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design of electrode layout for motor imagery based brain--computer interface , 2007 .

[5]  Qionghai Dai,et al.  Causality Analysis of Neural Connectivity: Critical Examination of Existing Methods and Advances of New Methods , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[6]  A. Doud,et al.  Continuous Three-Dimensional Control of a Virtual Helicopter Using a Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  R. Leeb,et al.  BCI Competition 2008 { Graz data set B , 2008 .

[8]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[9]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Rapid prototyping of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[11]  Snigdhansu Chatterjee,et al.  Exploring Granger causality between global average observed time series of carbon dioxide and temperature , 2011 .

[12]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .

[13]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging , 2000, Neural Networks.

[15]  James B. Elsner,et al.  Granger causality and Atlantic hurricanes , 2007 .

[16]  Ahmed H. Tewfik,et al.  Adapting subject specific motor imagery EEG patterns in space-time-frequency for a brain computer interface , 2009, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[17]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[18]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[19]  Kai Wang,et al.  Characterizing Dynamic Changes in the Human Blood Transcriptional Network , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Karla Felix Navarro,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Brain Interface Technology Designs , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[22]  Cheolsoo Park,et al.  Classification of Motor Imagery BCI Using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Componential Granger causality, and its application to identifying the source and mechanisms of the top–down biased activation that controls attention to affective vs sensory processing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Spatio-temporal Granger causality: A new framework , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  Qing Gao,et al.  Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality , 2011, NeuroImage.