Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?

This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent’s mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation’s wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.

[1]  N. Hadker,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: evidence from a Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[2]  Karine Nyborg,et al.  Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values , 2000 .

[3]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  A META ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENT VALUES FOR GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES , 2000 .

[4]  J. Turpie,et al.  The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: how interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay , 2003 .

[5]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[6]  C. Tisdell,et al.  The Net Benefit of Saving the Asian Elephant: A Policy and Contingent Valuation Study , 2004 .

[7]  R. Carson,et al.  Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone , 1994 .

[8]  P. Boxall,et al.  Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation , 2000 .

[9]  James K. Hammitt,et al.  Contingent valuation of a Taiwanese wetland , 2001, Environment and Development Economics.

[10]  Tore Söderqvist,et al.  Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden , 2003 .

[11]  Randall A. Kramer,et al.  Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species , 1999 .

[12]  I. Bateman,et al.  First impressions count: interviewer appearance and information effects in stated preference studies , 2004 .

[13]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Valuing the diversity of biodiversity , 2006 .

[14]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey , 2000 .

[15]  John Quiggin,et al.  Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire , 1994 .

[16]  John E. Keith,et al.  The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach , 2002 .

[17]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Internal and external scope in willingness-to-pay estimates for threatened and endangered wildlife , 1999 .

[18]  E. Pouta,et al.  Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland , 2003 .

[19]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Panel Stratification in Meta-Analysis of Economic Studies: An Investigation of Its Effects in the Recreation Valuation Literature , 2000, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[20]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation , 1994 .

[21]  J. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefit of the protection program for the Steller sea lion , 2002 .

[22]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  The Relationship between the Income Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay , 1997 .

[23]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[24]  L. Brander,et al.  The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature , 2006 .

[25]  T. Stevens,et al.  Public attitudes and values for wetland conservation in New South Wales, Australia , 1998 .

[26]  S. Yoo,et al.  Estimating the Public's Value for Urban Forest in the Seoul Metropolitan Area of Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study , 2003 .

[27]  Toyoaki Washida,et al.  Economic valuation of the Seto Inland Sea by using an Internet CV survey. , 2003, Marine pollution bulletin.

[28]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration , 2004 .

[29]  V. Smith,et al.  Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a "Scope" Test? A Meta Analysis , 1996 .

[30]  J. Stoll,et al.  Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land , 1985, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[31]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Economics and the design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments , 2003 .

[32]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Ceteris paribus, meta-analysis and value transfer , 2002 .

[33]  J. Loomis,et al.  A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire , 1998 .

[34]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[35]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[36]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Introduction to the environmental Kuznets curve special issue , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[37]  John V. Krutilla,et al.  The Economics of Natural Environments , 1975 .

[38]  Double Bounded Survival Values for Preserving the Landscape of Natural Parks , 1996 .

[39]  J. Loomis,et al.  The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California , 1997 .

[40]  Y. Ying,et al.  External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan's rice fields , 2005 .

[41]  A. Munro.  Household willingness to pay equals individual willingness to pay if and only if the household income pools , 2005 .

[42]  P. White,et al.  The use of willingness‐to‐pay approaches in mammal conservation , 2001 .

[43]  U. Ebert.  Environmental Goods and the Distribution of Income , 2003 .

[44]  H. Amirnejad,et al.  Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method , 2006 .

[45]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates , 1990 .

[46]  J. Bennett.  USING DIRECT QUESTIONING TO VALUE THE EXISTENCE BENEFITS OF PRESERVED NATURAL AREAS , 1984 .

[47]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques , 2002 .

[48]  M. Shechter,et al.  Measuring Passive Use Value: Pledges, Donations and CV Responses in Connection with an Important Natural Resource , 1998 .

[49]  D. Elston,et al.  Modelling the Non-market Environmental Costs and Benefits of Biodiversity Projects Using Contingent Valuation Data , 2001 .

[50]  A. Dragun,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Applications , 1996 .

[51]  Annegrete Bruvoll,et al.  Quantifying Central Hypotheses on Environmental Kuznets Curves for a Rich Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Study , 2003 .

[52]  Zhang Zhiqiang,et al.  Applying contingent valuation in China to measure the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Ejina region , 2003 .

[53]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[54]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Meta-Analysis in Environmental Economics , 1997 .

[55]  Yong-Suhk Wui,et al.  The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[56]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness. , 1983 .

[57]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource , 1988 .

[58]  Nota Di Lavoro,et al.  Introduction : What is the Environmental Kuznets Curve ? , 2003 .

[59]  J. Loomis.  Expanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions , 1987 .

[60]  Piran C. L. White,et al.  Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris , 1997 .

[61]  I. Bateman,et al.  Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1997 .

[62]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation? , 2002 .

[63]  Michael A. McPherson,et al.  Environmental Kuznets curve: threatened species and spatial effects , 2005 .

[64]  R. Deacon,et al.  Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Describe How Individual Countries Behave? , 2004, Land Economics.

[65]  Luke Brander,et al.  The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[66]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies , 1999 .

[67]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .

[68]  B. Solomon,et al.  The Florida manatee and eco-tourism: toward a safe minimum standard , 2004 .

[69]  Knut Veisten,et al.  Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[70]  Michael Drummond,et al.  The use of meta-analysis in economic evaluation , 1999 .

[71]  R. Subade.  Valuing Biodiversity Conservation in a World Heritage Site: Citizen's Non-use Values for Tubbataha Reefs National Marine Park, Philippines , 2005 .

[72]  P. Riera,et al.  Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one? , 1996 .

[73]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[74]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[75]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies , 1995 .

[76]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[77]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland , 2008 .

[78]  I. Mannino,et al.  The role of agroforestry networks in landscape socioeconomic processes : the potential and limits of the contingent valuation method , 2001 .

[79]  J. Richer.  WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR DESERT PROTECTION , 1995 .

[80]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Stated preference surveys of remnant native vegetation conservation , 1999 .

[81]  A. Dragun,et al.  The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method , 2001 .

[82]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism , 1999 .

[83]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. , 2003 .

[84]  M. Adler,et al.  Contingent valuation studies and health policy , 2010, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[85]  Henrik Lindhjem,et al.  20 Years of Stated Preference Valuation of Non-Timber Benefits from Fennoscandian Forests: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[86]  M. Bleaney,et al.  Economic growth and income inequality , 2002 .

[87]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation , 2005 .

[88]  Felix Schläpfer.  Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[89]  John V. Krutilla,et al.  The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources , 1973 .

[90]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .

[91]  L. Kaldor.  The World Economic Outlook , 1983 .