Developing a projects evaluation system based on multiple attribute value theory

This paper presents the development process of an evaluation system to help the Portuguese Public Administration to choose a portfolio of projects for financing within the scope of Measure 1.5 of the Operational Program of the Portuguese Centro Region. The theoretical tool used is multiple attribute value theory, which focuses on the prescription of decisions in non-structured multiple objective decision scenarios. Problem structuring involved defining objectives in agreement with national development program and European Community policies, and attributes to measure the achievement of projects with respect to them. The approach required the assessment of value functions for each of the attributes, validation of independence conditions of decision makers and, finally, the aggregation of single attribute value functions into an overall multiple attribute value function (OMVF). All these structuring steps were carried out based on the preferences of a panel of decision makers with wide experience in managing and selecting projects within similar programs. The system developed, supported by a computer interface, is nowadays used to measure the appropriateness of projects to regional development goals; a project is chosen for financing if its value achieves the threshold. A portfolio of four projects embracing a range of characteristics rich enough to conclude about its performance illustrates its application.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[2]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[3]  M. Allais,et al.  The General Theory of Random Choices in Relation to the Invariant Cardinal Utility Function and the Specific Probability Function. The (U, θ) Model A General Overview , 1988 .

[4]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Structuring Objectives for Problems of Public Interest , 1988, Oper. Res..

[5]  B. Roy Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[6]  Martin Weber,et al.  Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making , 1993 .

[7]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality , 1995 .

[8]  B. Roy,et al.  The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works , 1996 .

[9]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Using Values in Operations Research , 1994, Oper. Res..

[10]  W. M. Gorman The Structure of Utility Functions , 1968 .

[11]  R. Słowiński,et al.  Stochastic Versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming under Uncertainty , 1990, Theory and Decision Library.

[12]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[13]  D. M. Deighton,et al.  Computers in Operations Research , 1977, Aust. Comput. J..

[14]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[15]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[19]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Foundations of Risk Measurement. I. Risk As Probable Loss , 1984 .

[20]  D. A. Conway,et al.  The Art of Problem Solving , 1978 .

[21]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  R. Keeney Utility Functions for Multiattributed Consequences , 1972 .

[23]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[24]  Milan Zeleny An essay into a philosophy of MCDM: A way of thinking or another algorithm? , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[25]  S. French Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality , 1986 .