The effect of harness suspension on a simulated maintenance task efficacy in the renewable energy industry.

Building, bridge or wind turbine maintenance requires manual dexterity tasks by a specialist rope-access trained workforce via two principal means: harness suspension of individual workers from above, or deployment of a suspended platform or cradle from which workers access the structure to be maintained. Currently no published research compares accuracy and efficiency of simulated maintenance tasks between these modalities. This study investigated manual dexterity task performance of peg placement and shape delineation in seated, standing and suspended environments in 16 healthy controls and 26 professional rope-access trained individuals. Both seated and standing assessments were superior to those suspended, and height of suspension, total mass and years of experience had no influence on the task outcome. These findings suggest that, where feasible, cradle suspension mechanisms which permit standing maintenance are favourable in terms of task efficacy and where feasible, should be considered for deployment in wind energy and other engineering applications.

[1]  Neil J. Mansfield,et al.  Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective workload during whole-body vibration exposure while seated in upright and twisted postures with and without armrests , 2008 .

[2]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  The combined influence of task accuracy and pace on motor variability in a standardised repetitive precision task , 2015, Ergonomics.

[3]  A. Kincaid,et al.  Assessment of Fine Motor Skill in Musicians and Nonmusicians: Differences in Timing versus Sequence Accuracy in a Bimanual Fingering Task , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Alan Barr,et al.  Evaluation of a dynamic arm support for seated and standing tasks: a laboratory study of electromyography and subjective feedback , 2007, Ergonomics.

[5]  Kaj Bo Veiersted,et al.  Working suspended in a harness rig: A comparative study of musculoskeletal health complaints in rope access technicians and controls. , 2017, Work.

[6]  M. Marfell-Jones,et al.  International standards for anthropometric assessment. , 2012 .

[7]  A. Nevill,et al.  Shape change and obesity prevalence among male UK offshore workers after 30 years: New insight from a 3D scanning study , 2017, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[8]  R J Shephard,et al.  Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). , 1992, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[9]  J. M. Lockhart,et al.  Effect of rate and level of lowered finger surface temperature on manual performance. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  G Havenith,et al.  Physiological criteria for functioning of hands in the cold: a review. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  A. Adisesh,et al.  Harness suspension and first aid management: development of an evidence-based guideline , 2010, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[13]  Jae Kun Shim,et al.  Inter-joint synergies increase with motor task uncertainty in a whole-body pointing task , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  M. McDonnell,et al.  Measuring dexterity in the podiatrist population: a cross-sectional comparison of novice students and experienced podiatrists , 2018, BMC Medical Education.

[15]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Task Performance is Prioritized Over Energy Reduction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Coordination between posture and movement: interaction between postural and accuracy constraints , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.