Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.

Perceived benefit, satisfaction, and hearing aid use patterns were measured in a follow-up study to a large-scale multi-site clinical trial conducted in 1996-97. Measures included the Hearing Aid Status Questionnaire, the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. On the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, hearing aid users indicated more unaided difficulty in easy listening situations and less aided benefit in more difficult listening situations compared to the original study. Subjects who no longer used hearing aids indicated less difficulty in unaided situations. All measures indicated significant long-term subjective benefit and satisfaction with hearing aids. Although understanding speech in noise or in group situations continues to be problematic, subjects reported wearing their hearing aids almost all of the time in both easy and difficult listening situations.

[1]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and Validation of a Client-centered Outcome Measure for Hearing Aid Services , 1999 .

[2]  Suzanne C. Purdy,et al.  Investigation of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance in Experienced Hearing Aid Users , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[3]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R M Cox,et al.  Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  R M Cox,et al.  Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  B. Ford International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[7]  C. M. Beyer,et al.  Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Speech evoked cortical potentials: effects of age and stimulus presentation rate. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  D. Noffsinger,et al.  Subjective Measures of Hearing Aid Benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[10]  H. Hosford-Dunn,et al.  Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: predictive validity of fitting variables. Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  C. Broadbent,et al.  An Investigation of the Applicability of the Inventory, Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, at 2 Weeks Post Hearing Aid Fitting , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Pamela E. Souza,et al.  The Contribution of Amplitude Envelope Cues to Sentence Identification in Young and Aged Listeners , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Beamer Sl,et al.  Hearing aid benefit in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. , 2000 .

[14]  R. Bentler,et al.  Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[15]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  B. Ford International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. , 1984, The Medical journal of Australia.

[17]  R M Cox,et al.  Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[19]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  A Comparison of Two Measures of Hearing Aid Satisfaction in a Group of Elderly Hearing Aid Wearers , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[21]  R M Cox,et al.  Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[22]  R. Cox,et al.  Validation of the SADL questionnaire. , 2001, Ear and hearing.