Retaining Undergraduate Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology: A Survey of a Student Organization

National Council for Research on Women finds that much of the progress that women have made in science, engineering, and technology has stalled or eroded. As we enter the new millennium, there will be an increasing need for a scientifically and technologically literate workforce. A student organization, Women in Technology, was formed at Purdue University—West Lafayette in 1998 in response to data indicating that there had been no increase in the number of women enrolled in the University's School of Technology over the past five years. Such data were consistent with those produced by national studies indicating that the trend of increasing numbers of women enrolling in engineering, science, and technology programs in American colleges and universities, established in the preceding two decades, had ceased. The aim of Women in Technology was to attract more women to the School, and reduce the attrition rate of women already in the program by serving as a well-recognized, formal context in which they could receive mentoring and in which they could find stable social support to help them achieve their academic and career objectives. This article discusses an overview of the organization, the results of a survey of members' undergraduate classroom experiences, student-generated strategies for addressing the concerns revealed in the survey, and the implementation of those strategies.

[1]  Elaine Seymour The Role of Socialization in Shaping the Career‐Related Choices of Undergraduate Women in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors , 1999 .

[2]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[3]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[4]  Susan D. Kladiva Committee on Science House of Representatives , 1998 .

[5]  Patrick Love,et al.  Women's Ways of Knowing. , 1999 .

[6]  S. W. McGrath,et al.  Lost Talent: Women in the Sciences , 1997 .

[7]  Robert E. Quinn,et al.  Deep Change: Discovering the Leader Within , 1996 .

[8]  Marilyn J. Haring The Case for a Conceptual Base for Minority Mentoring Programs , 1999 .

[9]  Walter R. Borg,et al.  Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. , 1996 .

[10]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science , 1990 .

[11]  M. Thom,et al.  Balancing the Equation: Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? , 2001 .

[12]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[13]  Susan B. Millar,et al.  Networking-Mentoring: Career Strategy of Women in Academic Administration. , 1986 .

[14]  Iris R. Weiss,et al.  A Profile of Science and Mathematics Education in the United States, 1993 , 1994 .

[15]  Christopher Davis The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering , 1996 .

[16]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. , 1995 .

[17]  A. Borg What Draws Women to and Keeps Women in Computing? , 1999 .

[18]  M. Belenky Women's Ways Of Knowing , 1986 .

[19]  Richard Pearson,et al.  Women in science and engineering , 1985, Nature.

[20]  M. Wasburn Rebuilding Community: A Pilot Program for Decreasing Doctoral Student Attrition. , 2002 .

[21]  B. L. Smith,et al.  Creating Learning Communities. , 1993 .

[22]  A. Astin,et al.  Achieving educational excellence , 1985 .

[23]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .