Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Scintillation Pulse Timing

Including time-of-flight information in positron emission tomography reconstruction increases the signal-to-noise ratio if the timing information is sufficiently accurate. We estimate timing information by analyzing sampled waveforms, where the sampling frequency and number of samples acquired affect the accuracy of timing estimation. An efficient data-acquisition system acquires the minimum number of samples that contains the most timing information for a desired resolution. We describe a maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation algorithm to assign a time stamp to digital pulses. The method is based on a contracting-grid search algorithm that can be implemented in a field-programmable gate array and in graphics processing units. The Fisher-information (FI) matrix quantifies the amount of timing information that can be extracted from the waveforms. FI analyses on different segments of the waveform allow us to determine the smallest amount of data that we need to acquire in order to obtain a desired timing resolution. We describe the model and the procedure used to simulate waveforms for ML estimation and FI analysis, the ML-estimation algorithm and the timing resolution obtained from experimental data using a LaBr3:Ce crystal and two photomultiplier tubes. The results show that for lengthening segments of the pulse, timing resolution approaches a limit. We explored the method as a function of sampling frequency and compared the results to other digital time pickoff methods. This information will be used to build an efficient data-acquisition system with reduced complexity and cost that nonetheless preserves full timing performance.

[1]  E. Auffray,et al.  Time resolution deterioration with increasing crystal length in a TOF-PET system , 2014 .

[2]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  State of the art timing in TOF-PET detectors with LuAG, GAGG and L(Y)SO scintillators of various sizes coupled to FBK-SiPMs , 2016 .

[3]  M. Paganoni,et al.  In-depth study of single photon time resolution for the Philips digital silicon photomultiplier , 2016 .

[4]  Luca Caucci,et al.  Maximum-Likelihood Estimation With a Contracting-Grid Search Algorithm , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Luca Caucci,et al.  GPU programming for biomedical imaging , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[6]  P. Jarron,et al.  On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance , 2015 .

[7]  W. Moses,et al.  Effects of Ce concentration on scintillation properties of LaBr/sub 3/:Ce , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[8]  C. Levin,et al.  Analytical calculation of the lower bound on timing resolution for PET scintillation detectors comprising high-aspect-ratio crystal elements , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Setsuro Kinbara,et al.  A leading-edge time pickoff circuit , 1969 .

[10]  C. Levin,et al.  The lower timing resolution bound for scintillators with non-negligible optical photon transport time in time-of-flight PET , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  A full-field modular gamma camera. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Maria Ruiz-Gonzalez,et al.  Fisher information analysis of digital pulse timing , 2015 .

[13]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Joshua W Cates,et al.  Advances in coincidence time resolution for PET , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  T. Budinger Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  D. Schaart,et al.  The lower bound on the timing resolution of scintillation detectors , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  W. Moses Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET. , 2006, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[20]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[21]  G. Borghi,et al.  Sub-200 ps CRT in monolithic scintillator PET detectors using digital SiPM arrays and maximum likelihood interaction time estimation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. A. Gedcke,et al.  A constant fraction of pulse height trigger for optimum time resolution , 1967 .

[23]  L. Eriksson,et al.  Estimating image quality for future generations of TOF PET scanners , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[24]  Time-of-flight precision and PET image accuracy , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[25]  P. Dorenbos,et al.  Accurate measurements of the rise and decay times of fast scintillators with solid state photon counters , 2012, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[26]  Dennis R. Schaart,et al.  A comprehensive characterization of the time resolution of the Philips Digital Photon Counter , 2016 .

[27]  H. Barrett,et al.  Maximum-Likelihood Methods for Processing Signals From Gamma-Ray Detectors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[28]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Advances in digital SiPMs and their application in biomedical imaging , 2016 .

[29]  Z. Podolyák,et al.  Digital processing of signals from LaBr3:Ce scintillation detectors , 2014 .

[30]  F. Beekman,et al.  LaBr3:Ce and SiPMs for time-of-flight PET: achieving 100 ps coincidence resolving time , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  D. Schaart,et al.  A Comprehensive Model to Predict the Timing Resolution of SiPM-Based Scintillation Detectors: Theory and Experimental Validation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[32]  Christian Bohm,et al.  Sampling Pulses for Optimal Timing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[33]  Giacomo Borghi,et al.  Probabilities of triggering and validation in a digital silicon photomultiplier , 2014 .

[34]  R. G. Simpson,et al.  A Modular Scintillation Camera for Use in Nuclear Medicine , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.