Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size

The anatomy of the corpus callosum (CC) has been advocated as a potential marker for functional lateralization because its size is supposedly proportional to the number of fibers connecting the hemispheres. Previous morphometric studies of this relationship have compared CC size in groups of subjects who are more or less likely to show differences in their lateralization (e.g., left vs right handers). The findings, however, have been inconsistent, and to our knowledge, no previous study has directly compared CC size with lateralization assessed by functional imaging data. We therefore combined anatomical measurements of CC size with left versus right hemisphere language activation in 74 normal subjects. After controlling for perceptual and motor output effects, as well as for global white-matter volume, handedness, gender and age, we found that subjects who had a larger CC showed more left lateralization for language in posterior temporal and inferior frontal regions. Examination of these effects revealed that, as CC size increased, stronger lateralization resulted from more left hemisphere activation in both regions as well as reduced right hemisphere activation in the posterior temporal region. Our observations provide the first clear evidence in normal subjects that the midsagittal surface area of the CC contributes to the degree to which language is functionally lateralized. We discuss the complex interhemispheric processes that might underlie this effect.

[1]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. M. Watson,et al.  Evaluating functional MRI procedures for assessing hemispheric language dominance in neurosurgical patients , 2005, Neuroradiology.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Why Voxel-Based Morphometry Should Be Used , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  H. Hécaen,et al.  Cerebral organization in left-handers , 1981, Brain and Language.

[5]  H. Scheich,et al.  Phonetic Perception and the Temporal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[7]  S G Kim,et al.  Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. , 1985, Archives of neurology.

[9]  T. Insel,et al.  Differential expansion of neural projection systems in primate brain evolution. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[10]  Mohamed L. Seghier,et al.  Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues☆ , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Importance of Distributed Sampling in Blocked Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Designs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. F. Witelson Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts the Extent and Impact of Cortical Activity in the Nondominant Hemisphere , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  J. O’Kusky,et al.  The corpus callosum is larger with right‐hemisphere cerebral speech dominance , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[16]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Human Brain: Left-Right Asymmetries in Temporal Speech Region , 1968, Science.

[17]  S. Resnick,et al.  An image-processing system for qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis of brain images. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for language , 2004, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  Y. Huang,et al.  Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum , 1992, Neurology.

[24]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Relationships between sulcal asymmetries and corpus callosum size: gender and handedness effects. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  K. Amunts,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of the human motor cortex related to handedness and gender , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  R. Caminiti,et al.  Callosal connections of dorso‐lateral premotor cortex , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects , 1999 .

[28]  E. Zaidel,et al.  Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  P. Broca Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé , 1865 .

[30]  M. Gazzaniga Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  J. Staiger,et al.  Using High-resolution , 2022 .

[32]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Handedness and cerebral anatomical asymmetries in young adult males , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  Method for quantitatively evaluating the lateralization of linguistic function using functional MR imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Combined Analysis of Language Tasks in fMRI Improves Assessment of Hemispheric Dominance for Language Functions in Individual Subjects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[38]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum , 1992, Brain Research.

[39]  S. Small,et al.  Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements , 2001, European journal of neurology.