Saliency based video quality prediction using multi-way data analysis

Saliency information allows us to determine which parts of an image or video frame attracts the focus of the observer and thus where distortions will be more obvious. Using this knowledge and saliency thresholds, we therefore combine the saliency information generated by a computational model and the features extracted from the H.264/AVC bitstream, and use the resulting saliency-weighted features in the design of a video quality metric with multi-way data analysis. We used two different multi-way methods, the two dimensional principal component regression (2D-PCR) and multi-way partial least squares regression (PLSR) in the design of a no-reference video quality metric, where the different saliency levels are considered as an additional direction. Our results show that the consideration of the the saliency information leads to more stable models with less parameters in the model and thus the prediction performance increases compared to metrics without saliency information for the same number of parameters.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[3]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  B. Kowalski,et al.  The parsimony principle applied to multivariate calibration , 1993 .

[6]  Judith Redi,et al.  Examining the effect of task on viewing behavior in videos using saliency maps , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Ofer Hadar,et al.  A metric for no-reference video quality assessment for HD TV delivery based on saliency maps , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[8]  Ulrich Engelke,et al.  Modelling saliency awareness for objective video quality assessment , 2010, 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[9]  Christian Keimel,et al.  Influence of viewing device and soundtrack in HDTV on subjective video quality , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Overt visual attention for free-viewing and quality assessment tasks Impact of the regions of interest on a video quality metric , 2010 .

[11]  R. Bro Multiway calibration. Multilinear PLS , 1996 .

[12]  Christian Keimel,et al.  The TUM high definition video datasets , 2012, 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[13]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  How the task of evaluating image quality influences viewing behavior , 2011, 2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[14]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[15]  Qingming Huang,et al.  Visual Saliency and Distortion Weighting Based Video Quality Assessment , 2012, PCM.

[16]  Christian Keimel,et al.  Design of no-reference video quality metrics with multiway partial least squares regression , 2011, 2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[17]  Tao Liu,et al.  Saliency based objective quality assessment of decoded video affected by packet losses , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  Hao Shen,et al.  Video is a Cube , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi-way Analysis with Applications in the Chemical Sciences , 2004 .