Device-to-Device (D2D) communication has currently been emerging as a promising technology to increase capacity and to extend coverage area in cellular communication network. D2D communication allows direct communication between two or more devices such as mobile user equipments without any base station help as a relay. However, enabling D2D features in cellular communication network will reveal more complex interference problems, because D2D communication could share the same frequency resources as its underlain cellular communication network. This paper analyzes the interference problems in such D2D communications underlying cellular communication network for downlink transmission. This paper explores the use of power control methods to reduce the effect of interference. The decision whether to increase or to decrease the power level on base station (evolved Node B/eNB in Fourth Generation/4G Cellular Networks) or on the transmitter of D2D pair (Transmitter of D2D User Equipment/TUE) is based on the estimated current Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio (SINR). First method of power control (PC-1) uses a fixed value to control the power level of the transmitter. Another one (PC-2) uses moving average of interference power values. The simulation was carried out to evaluate those two power control methods and its results in term of Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of SINR are compared to the system without power control method. The simulation results show that both power control methods contribute the improvement of performances; for one cellular equipment (CUE) and 100 pairs of D2D it achieved the improvement of SINR distribution at 5% with PC-1 and at 4% with PC-2 compared to the system without powr control, meanwhile for 1 D2D pair and 100 CUEs the CDF of SINR at 0 dB achieves 40%, 3%, and 0% for the systems without power control, with PC-1, and PC-2 methods, accordingly.
[1]
Tao Chen,et al.
Device-To-Device (D2D) Communication in Cellular Network - Performance Analysis of Optimum and Practical Communication Mode Selection
,
2010,
2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.
[2]
Martin Haardt,et al.
Quality of service oriented spatial processing in the Manhattan grid
,
2008,
2008 International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas.
[3]
Bin Guo,et al.
Interference Management for D2D Communications Underlying Cellular Networks at Cell Edge
,
2014,
ICWMC 2014.
[4]
Yi Zhang,et al.
Incentive Compatible Mode Selection and Spectrum Partitioning in Overlay D2D-Enabled Network
,
2015,
2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).
[5]
Jian Liu,et al.
QoS-based device-to-device communication schemes in heterogeneous wireless networks
,
2015,
IET Commun..
[6]
SHAHID MUMTAZ,et al.
Direct mobile-to-mobile communication: Paradigm for 5G
,
2014,
IEEE Wireless Communications.
[7]
Syaiful Alam,et al.
Downlink power control for interference management in femtocell-macrocell cellular communication network
,
2017,
2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering.
[8]
Xianchao Wang,et al.
Dynamic power control based on FFR for D2D communication underlaying cellular networks
,
2016,
2016 8th International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP).
[9]
S·南达,et al.
Interference management using power control
,
2008
.