Association and comparison between visual inspection and bitewing radiography for the detection of recurrent dental caries under restorations.

PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to investigate, in posterior teeth, the association between the characteristics of the margins of a restoration visually inspected and the presence, under restorations, of recurrent or residual dental caries detected by radiographic examination. Furthermore, the agreement between visual inspection and radiographs to detect dental caries was assessed. METHODS Eighty-five permanent molars and premolars with resin restorations on the interproximal and/or occlusal faces, from 18 patients, were submitted for visual inspection and radiographic examination. The visual inspection involved the criteria of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Bitewing radiographs were used for the radiographic examination. Logistic regression was used to analyse the association between the characteristics of the margins of a restoration assessed by visual inspection (absence of dental caries, or early, established, inactive and active lesions) and the presence of recurrent caries detected by radiographs. Kappa coefficients were calculated for determining agreement between the two methods. RESULTS The Kappa coefficient for agreement between visual inspection and radiographic examination was 0.19. Established lesions [odds ratio (OR) = 9.89; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.94-33.25; P < 0.05] and lesion activity (OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 0.91-7.27; P < 0.05) detected by visual inspection, were associated with recurrent or residual dental caries detected by radiographs. Restorations with established and active lesions at the margins had a greater chance of exhibiting recurrent or residual lesions in the radiographic examination. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The present findings demonstrate that restorations with established and active lesions at the margins when visually inspected often require removal and retreatment.

[1]  F. Schwendicke,et al.  Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  K. Kamburoğlu,et al.  Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques. , 2013, Operative dentistry.

[3]  I A Pretty,et al.  In vitro performance of different methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  A. Jablonski-Momeni,et al.  Use of ICDAS-II, Fluorescence-Based Methods, and Radiography in Detection and Treatment Decision of Occlusal Caries Lesions: An In Vitro Study , 2012, International journal of dentistry.

[5]  M. Braga,et al.  Radiographic and Laser Fluorescence Methods Have No Benefits for Detecting Caries in Primary Teeth , 2012, Caries Research.

[6]  K. Ekstrand,et al.  The Reliability and Accuracy of Two Methods for Proximal Caries Detection and Depth on Directly Visible Proximal Surfaces: An in vitro Study , 2011, Caries Research.

[7]  G. Eckert,et al.  In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions. , 2011, Operative dentistry.

[8]  C. Rahiotis,et al.  Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  Zu-yan Zhang,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by digital radiographs: an in vivo and in vitro comparative study. , 2010, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  T. Gurbuz,et al.  Performance of Laser Fluorescence for Residual Caries Detection in Primary Teeth , 2008, European Journal of Dentistry.

[11]  P. Gaengler,et al.  Comparative study of in vitro caries-like lesions and natural caries lesions at crown margins. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[12]  K. Ekstrand,et al.  Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[13]  Nigel Pitts,et al.  "ICDAS"--an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. , 2004, Community dental health.

[14]  G. Eckert,et al.  Evaluation of Several Techniques for the Detection of Secondary Caries Adjacent to Amalgam Restorations , 2004, Caries Research.

[15]  H. Forss,et al.  Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults , 2004, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[16]  A. Lennon,et al.  Residual Caries Detection Using Visible Fluorescence , 2002, Caries Research.

[17]  F Toffenetti,et al.  Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. , 2000, Quintessence international.

[18]  H. Groen,et al.  The residual caries dilemma. , 1998, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[19]  E. Kidd,et al.  Prediction of Secondary Caries around Tooth-colored Restorations: A Clinical and Microbiological Study , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[20]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  What is Known About Caries in Relation to Restorations as a Reason for Replacement? a Review , 1995 .

[21]  M. E. Davis,et al.  A microbiological study of recurrent dentinal caries. , 1994, Caries research.

[22]  J. A. Davies The relationship between change of dentist and treatment received in the General Dental Service , 1984, British Dental Journal.