Recent progress with large‐scale ab initio calculations: the CONQUEST code

While the success of density functional theory (DFT) has led to its use in a wide variety of fields such as physics, chemistry, materials science and biochemistry, it has long been recognised that conventional methods are very inefficient for large complex systems, because the memory requirements scale as N 2 and the cpu requirements as N 3 (where N is the number of atoms). The principles necessary to develop methods with linear scaling of the cpu and memory requirements with system size (O(N) methods) have been established for more than ten years, but only recently have practical codes showing this scaling for DFT started to appear. We report recent progress in the development of the CONQUEST code, which performs O(N) DFT calculations on parallel computers, and has a demonstrated ability to handle systems of over 10000 atoms. The code can be run at different levels of precision, ranging from empirical tight-binding, through ah initio tight-binding, to full ah initio, and techniques for calculating ionic forces in a consistent way at all levels of precision will be presented. Illustrations are given of practical CONQUEST calculations in the strained Ge/Si(001) system.

[1]  Kim,et al.  Total-energy global optimizations using nonorthogonal localized orbitals. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[2]  G. Bauer,et al.  Structural properties of self-organized semiconductor nanostructures , 2004 .

[3]  Aoki,et al.  Rapidly convergent bond order expansion for atomistic simulations. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[4]  P. Giannozzi,et al.  Towards Very Large-Scale Electronic-Structure Calculations , 1992 .

[5]  Martin,et al.  Unconstrained minimization approach for electronic computations that scales linearly with system size. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  米沢 富美子 The physics of complex liquids , 1998 .

[7]  O. Sankey,et al.  Ab initio multicenter tight-binding model for molecular-dynamics simulations and other applications in covalent systems. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  M. Gillan,et al.  Tight binding studies of strained Ge/Si(001) growth , 2003 .

[9]  S. Goedecker Minima hopping: an efficient search method for the global minimum of the potential energy surface of complex molecular systems. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  David E. Manolopoulos,et al.  Canonical purification of the density matrix in electronic-structure theory , 1998 .

[11]  Car,et al.  Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density-functional theory. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[12]  J. Grossman,et al.  Linear-scaling quantum Monte Carlo calculations. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  Srivastava,et al.  Electronic structure , 2001, Physics Subject Headings (PhySH).

[14]  D. Pettifor,et al.  A comparison of linear scaling tight-binding methods , 1997 .

[15]  Gustavo E. Scuseria,et al.  Semiempirical methods with conjugate gradient density matrix search to replace diagonalization for molecular systems containing thousands of atoms , 1997 .

[16]  G. Kresse,et al.  Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set , 1996 .

[17]  Li,et al.  Density-matrix electronic-structure method with linear system-size scaling. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  Harris Simplified method for calculating the energy of weakly interacting fragments. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[19]  Arash A. Mostofi,et al.  Preconditioned iterative minimization for linear-scaling electronic structure calculations , 2003 .

[20]  David R. Bowler,et al.  Length-scale ill conditioning in linear-scaling DFT , 1998 .

[21]  M. R. Spiegel E and M , 1981 .

[22]  Vanderbilt,et al.  Generalization of the density-matrix method to a nonorthogonal basis. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[23]  Arash A. Mostofi,et al.  Total-energy calculations on a real space grid with localized functions and a plane-wave basis , 2002 .

[24]  Yang,et al.  Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[25]  Hernández,et al.  Linear-scaling density-functional-theory technique: The density-matrix approach. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[26]  T. Nagao,et al.  Origin of the stability of Ge(105) on si: a new structure model and surface strain relaxation. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[27]  Arash A. Mostofi,et al.  Nonorthogonal generalized Wannier function pseudopotential plane-wave method , 2002 .

[28]  David R. Bowler,et al.  Practical methods for ab initio calculations on thousands of atoms , 1999 .

[29]  D. Sánchez-Portal,et al.  Numerical atomic orbitals for linear-scaling calculations , 2001, cond-mat/0104170.

[30]  D. Pettifor,et al.  New many-body potential for the bond order. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[31]  Peter D. Haynes,et al.  Corrected penalty-functional method for linear-scaling calculations within density-functional theory , 1999 .

[32]  David R. Bowler,et al.  Density matrices in O(N) electronic structure calculations: theory and applications , 1998 .

[33]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Closely approximating second-order Mo/ller–Plesset perturbation theory with a local triatomics in molecules model , 2000 .

[34]  M. J. Gillan,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Linear-scaling quantum Monte Carlo technique with non-orthogonal localized orbitals , 2004 .

[35]  Hideaki Fujitani,et al.  Transferable atomic-type orbital basis sets for solids , 2000 .

[36]  Martin,et al.  Linear system-size scaling methods for electronic-structure calculations. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[37]  Taisuke Ozaki,et al.  Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr , 2004 .

[38]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[39]  David R. Bowler,et al.  Recent progress in linear scaling ab initio electronic structure techniques , 2002 .

[40]  Walter Kohn,et al.  Analytic Properties of Bloch Waves and Wannier Functions , 1959 .

[41]  S. Goedecker Linear scaling electronic structure methods , 1999 .

[42]  Jean-Luc Fattebert,et al.  Linear scaling first-principles molecular dynamics with controlled accuracy , 2004, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[43]  Chee Kwan Gan,et al.  First-principles density-functional calculations using localized spherical-wave basis sets , 2001, 1807.04926.

[44]  Galli,et al.  Large scale electronic structure calculations. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[45]  Colombo,et al.  Efficient linear scaling algorithm for tight-binding molecular dynamics. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[46]  Car,et al.  Orbital formulation for electronic-structure calculations with linear system-size scaling. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[47]  D R Bowler,et al.  Atomic force algorithms in density functional theory electronic-structure techniques based on local orbitals. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[48]  Kohn,et al.  Density functional and density matrix method scaling linearly with the number of atoms. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[49]  M. Gillan,et al.  A first principles study of sub-monolayer Ge on Si(001) , 2002 .

[50]  J. Fattebert,et al.  Towards grid-based OÑNÖ density-functional theory methods: Optimized nonorthogonal orbitals and multigrid acceleration , 2000 .

[51]  Taisuke Ozaki,et al.  Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures , 2003 .

[52]  Kiyoyuki Terakura,et al.  Convergent recursive O(N) method for ab initio tight-binding calculations , 2001 .

[53]  Hernández,et al.  Self-consistent first-principles technique with linear scaling. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[54]  Soler,et al.  Self-consistent order-N density-functional calculations for very large systems. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[55]  D. Sánchez-Portal,et al.  The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation , 2001, cond-mat/0111138.

[56]  Peter D. Haynes,et al.  Localised spherical-wave basis set for O(N) total-energy pseudopotential calculations , 1997 .

[57]  T. Arias Multiresolution analysis of electronic structure: semicardinal and wavelet bases , 1998, cond-mat/9805262.

[58]  Johnson,et al.  Modified Broyden's method for accelerating convergence in self-consistent calculations. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[59]  Matt Challacombe,et al.  A simplified density matrix minimization for linear scaling self-consistent field theory , 1999 .

[60]  David R. Bowler,et al.  Parallel sparse matrix multiplication for linear scaling electronic structure calculations , 2001 .

[61]  R. Mcweeny Some Recent Advances in Density Matrix Theory , 1960 .

[62]  Philippe Y. Ayala,et al.  Linear scaling second-order Moller–Plesset theory in the atomic orbital basis for large molecular systems , 1999 .

[63]  Foulkes,et al.  Tight-binding models and density-functional theory. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[64]  Chris-Kriton Skylaris,et al.  Introducing ONETEP: linear-scaling density functional simulations on parallel computers. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[65]  C. M. Goringe,et al.  Basis functions for linear-scaling first-principles calculations , 1997 .

[66]  Eduardo Hernández,et al.  Linear-scaling DFT-pseudopotential calculations on parallel computers , 1997 .