Multivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis

Multivariate meta-analysis combines estimates of several related parameters over several studies. These parameters can, for example, refer to multiple outcomes or comparisons between more than two groups. A new Stata command, mvmeta, performs maximum likelihood, restricted maximum likelihood, or method-of-moments estimation of random-effects multivariate meta-analysis models. A utility command, mvmeta_make, facilitates the preparation of summary datasets from more detailed data. The commands are illustrated with data from the Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration, a meta-analysis of observational studies; I estimate the shape of the association between a quantitative exposure and disease events by grouping the quantitative exposure into several categories.

[1]  Alicja R. Rudnicka,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of prospective studies of plasma fibrinogen and cardiovascular disease , 2004, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[2]  Alexander J Sutton,et al.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  S G Thompson,et al.  A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  S L Normand,et al.  Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Julian P. T. Higgins,et al.  Meta-Regression in Stata , 2008 .

[6]  P C Lambert,et al.  An evaluation of bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  P. J. Verweij,et al.  Penalized likelihood in Cox regression. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  S G Thompson,et al.  Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated , 1994, BMJ.

[9]  G. Lu,et al.  Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Beyond the Bench: Hunting Down Fugitive Literature , 2004, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[11]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  H Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  C S Berkey,et al.  Multiple-outcome meta-analysis of clinical trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Dan Jackson,et al.  Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta‐analyses , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  M. Schemper,et al.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  P J Catalano,et al.  Goodness-of-fit for GEE: an example with mental health service utilization. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  F Mosteller,et al.  Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Meta-analysis of Multitreatment Studies , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[20]  S. Cessie,et al.  Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression , 1992 .

[21]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[22]  D. Firth.  Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates , 1993 .

[23]  B. O'brien,et al.  Cost–effectiveness analysis for multinational clinical trials , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Guido Knapp,et al.  Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate , 2003, Statistics in medicine.