Evaluating Shallow Convection Parameterization Assumptions With a qt–w Quadrant Analysis

Uncertainties associated with the response of shallow clouds to global warming remain a great challenge for climate projection. Due to the small size of these clouds, parameterizations are required to represent them in both current‐ and next‐generation climate models. We present a quantitative evaluation of several important assumptions used in both mass‐flux and Assumed‐PDF Higher‐Order Closure parameterizations of shallow convection. We use large‐eddy simulations (LESs) of four different shallow convection regimes as benchmarks and apply a qt (total moisture)–w (vertical velocity) quadrant analysis technique to identify the “coherent structures” of moist and dry up/down‐drafts. The statistics of these coherent structures and the environment are then used to evaluate commonly used assumptions in mass‐flux parameterizations related to (a) the convective downdrafts and (b) the subplume variability of convective updrafts. For quantitative evaluation of the PDF closure used in AP‐HOCs, we perform offline calculations with the PDF closure used in the Cloud Layers Unified By Bi‐normals and the Simplified Higher‐Order Closure schemes by supplying the closure with statistical quantities directly calculated from the LESs. Then, the impact of parameterization assumptions embedded in the PDF closure in the same two categories is analyzed and understood through comparisons of the output from the closure with the statistics of the moist and dry up/down‐drafts from the LESs.

[1]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Influences of environmental relative humidity and horizontal scale of sub-cloud ascent on deep convective initiation , 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

[2]  Minghuai Wang,et al.  Assessing CLUBB PDF Closure Assumptions for a Continental Shallow‐to‐Deep Convective Transition Case Over Multiple Spatial Scales , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[3]  L. Denby,et al.  Characterising the shape, size, and orientation of cloud‐feeding coherent boundary‐layer structures , 2020, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[4]  João Paulo Teixeira,et al.  On the Parameterization of Convective Downdrafts for Marine Stratocumulus Clouds , 2020, Monthly Weather Review.

[5]  J. Thuburn,et al.  Diagnosing Coherent Structures in the Convective Boundary Layer by Optimizing Their Vertical Turbulent Scalar Transfer , 2019, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[6]  R. Newsom,et al.  The Impact of Variable Land‐Atmosphere Coupling on Convective Cloud Populations Observed During the 2016 HI‐SCALE Field Campaign , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[7]  J. Teixeira,et al.  A Unified Eddy-Diffusivity/Mass-Flux Approach for Modeling Atmospheric Convection , 2019, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

[8]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Overview of the HI-SCALE Field Campaign: A New Perspective on Shallow Convective Clouds , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[9]  N. Villefranque,et al.  Object‐Oriented Identification of Coherent Structures in Large Eddy Simulations: Importance of Downdrafts in Stratocumulus , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[10]  Tapio Schneider,et al.  An Extended Eddy‐Diffusivity Mass‐Flux Scheme for Unified Representation of Subgrid‐Scale Turbulence and Convection , 2018, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[11]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The Sensitivity of Numerical Simulations of Cloud‐Topped Boundary Layers to Cross‐Grid Flow , 2018 .

[12]  P. Gentine,et al.  Coherent Structures in Large-Eddy Simulations of a Nonprecipitating Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layer , 2017 .

[13]  Steven C. Sherwood,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of Cumulus Thermals , 2016 .

[14]  M. Farge,et al.  Coherent Structures in the Boundary and Cloud Layers: Role of Updrafts, Subsiding Shells, and Environmental Subsidence , 2016 .

[15]  J. Wallace.  Quadrant Analysis in Turbulence Research: History and Evolution , 2016 .

[16]  R. Neggers.  Exploring bin‐macrophysics models for moist convective transport and clouds , 2015 .

[17]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  Second‐moment budgets in cloud topped boundary layers: A large‐eddy simulation study , 2015 .

[18]  D. Randall,et al.  Fitting and Analyzing LES Using Multiple Trivariate Gaussians , 2015 .

[19]  Sungsu Park,et al.  A Unified Convection Scheme (UNICON). Part I: Formulation , 2014 .

[20]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Water vapor turbulence profiles in stationary continental convective mixed layers , 2014 .

[21]  S. Krueger,et al.  A simplified PDF parameterization of subgrid‐scale clouds and turbulence for cloud‐resolving models , 2013 .

[22]  J. T. Dawe,et al.  Statistical analysis of an LES shallow cumulus cloud ensemble using a cloud tracking algorithm , 2011 .

[23]  H. Graf,et al.  An Ensemble Cumulus Convection Parameterization with Explicit Cloud Treatment , 2010 .

[24]  Peter A. Bogenschutz,et al.  Assumed Probability Density Functions for Shallow and Deep Convection , 2010 .

[25]  Catherine Rio,et al.  Resolved Versus Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part I: A Parametrization-Oriented Conditional Sampling in Large-Eddy Simulations , 2010 .

[26]  Frits H. Post,et al.  A statistical approach to the life cycle analysis of cumulus clouds selected in a virtual reality environment , 2009 .

[27]  P. Zuidema,et al.  On the use of PDF schemes to parameterize sub‐grid clouds , 2009 .

[28]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[29]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[30]  Thijs Heus,et al.  A refined view of vertical mass transport by cumulus convection , 2008 .

[31]  V. Masson,et al.  Negative water vapour skewness and dry tongues in the convective boundary layer: observations and large-eddy simulation budget analysis , 2007 .

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  How might a statistical cloud scheme be coupled to a mass‐flux convection scheme? , 2005 .

[33]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Evaluation of Large-Eddy Simulations via Observations of Nocturnal Marine Stratocumulus , 2005 .

[34]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Life Cycle of Numerically Simulated Shallow Cumulus Clouds. Part I: Transport , 2005 .

[35]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Life Cycle of Numerically Simulated Shallow Cumulus Clouds. Part II: Mixing Dynamics , 2005 .

[36]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[37]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Boundary Layer Depth, Entrainment, and Decoupling in the Cloud-Capped Subtropical and Tropical Marine Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[38]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  A New Parameterization for Shallow Cumulus Convection and Its Application to Marine Subtropical Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers. Part I: Description and 1D Results , 2004 .

[39]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  A Large Eddy Simulation Intercomparison Study of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2003 .

[40]  D. Randall,et al.  Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities , 2003 .

[41]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description , 2002 .

[42]  W. Cotton,et al.  Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions , 2002 .

[43]  David A. Randall,et al.  Toward a Unified Parameterization of the Boundary Layer and Moist Convection. Part III: Simulations of Clear and Cloudy Convection. , 2001 .

[44]  David A. Randall,et al.  Toward a Unified Parameterization of the Boundary Layer and Moist Convection. Part II: Lateral Mass Exchanges and Subplume-Scale Fluxes , 2001 .

[45]  David A. Randall,et al.  Toward a Unified Parameterization of the Boundary Layer and Moist Convection. Part I: A New Type of Mass-Flux Model , 2001 .

[46]  K.,et al.  Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion , 2001 .

[47]  J. McWilliams,et al.  Coherent structures and dynamics in a neutrally stratified planetary boundary layer flow , 1996 .

[48]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Evaluation of Parametric Assumptions for Shallow Cumulus Convection , 1995 .

[49]  W. S. Lewellen,et al.  Binormal Model of Ensemble Partial Cloudiness , 1993 .

[50]  Jorgen B. Jensen,et al.  A Study of the Source of Entrained Air in Montana Cumuli , 1988 .

[51]  J. Deardorff.  Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model , 1980 .

[52]  J. Deardorff,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Condensation in Models of Nonprecipitating Clouds , 1977 .

[53]  J. Warner,et al.  On Steady-State One-Dimensional Models of Cumulus Convection , 1970 .

[54]  R. Seager,et al.  Persistent Discrepancies between Observed and Modeled Trends in the Tropical Pacific Ocean , 2022 .

[55]  D. Mironov,et al.  Turbulence in the Lower Troposphere: Second-Order Closure and Mass–Flux Modelling Frameworks , 2008 .

[56]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[57]  Kuan-Man Xu,et al.  Simulation of shallow cumuli and their transition to deep convective clouds by cloud‐resolving models with different third‐order turbulence closures , 2006 .

[58]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  Mass-Flux Budgets of Shallow Cumulus Clouds , 2001 .

[59]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Numerical Simulations and a Conceptual Model of the Stratocumulus to Trade Cumulus Transition , 1997 .