Fuzzy concepts and large literature corpi: Addressing methodological challenges in systematic reviews

[1]  Michael K. Filsecker,et al.  Engagement as a Volitional Construct , 2014 .

[2]  J. Reeve.  How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. , 2013 .

[3]  E. Kahu.  Framing student engagement in higher education , 2013 .

[4]  J. Matjasko,et al.  Engagement Across Developmental Periods , 2012 .

[5]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning , 2011 .

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[7]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. , 2008 .

[8]  Joseph R. Rausch,et al.  Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Assumptions for statistical inference , 1993 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  How Appropriate are Popular Sample Size Formulas , 1989 .

[14]  J. Brunton,et al.  Information management in reviews , 2012 .

[15]  E. Skinner,et al.  Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience , 2012 .

[16]  Andrew J. Martin.  Part II Commentary: Motivation and Engagement: Conceptual, Operational, and Empirical Clarity , 2012 .

[17]  J. Reeve.  A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement , 2012 .