The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension

Abstract This chapter presents an integrated model of text and picture comprehension that takes into account that learners can use multiple sensory modalities. The model encompasses reading comprehension, listening comprehension, visual picture comprehension, and sound comprehension (i.e., auditory picture comprehension). The model's cognitive architecture consists of sensory registers, working memory, and long-term memory. It furthermore includes a cognitive level and a perceptual level. The cognitive level is characterized by two representational channels: a verbal channel and a pictorial channel. The perceptual level is characterized by multiple sensory channels. After presenting the model, the chapter derives predictions, which can be empirically tested. It reports research findings that can be explained by the model, and it derives practical suggestions for instructional design. Finally, the chapter discusses limitations of the model and points out directions for further research. Introduction The term multimedia means different things on different levels. On the level of technology, it means the use of multiple delivery media such as computers, screens, and loudspeakers. On the level of presentation formats, it means the use of different forms of representation such as texts and pictures. On the level of sensory modalities, it means the use of multiple senses such as the eye and the ear. The level of technology is of course very important in practice, but it is not of high interest from a psychological point of view, because comprehension is not fundamentally different when a text passage is delivered either by a computer screen or by a printed book, or if a picture is presented by a poster or by a slide.

[1]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[2]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[4]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[5]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[6]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A Trading Relationship between Reading Skill and Domain Knowledge in Children's Text Comprehension. , 1995 .

[7]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[9]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[10]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .

[11]  Richard K. Lowe Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram , 1996 .

[12]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Visual imagery can impede reasoning , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[13]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences. , 1983 .

[14]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The selective impairment of phonological processing: A case study , 1983, Brain and Language.

[15]  Paul Ginns Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[17]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[18]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[19]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Learning to read : basic research and its implications , 1993 .

[20]  Dale M. Willows,et al.  The Psychology of illustration , 1987 .

[21]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[22]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[23]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[24]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[25]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[26]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[27]  M Hegarty,et al.  Mental animation in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[29]  Phillip J. Moore,et al.  Verbal and visual learning styles , 1988 .

[30]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory , 1992 .

[31]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[32]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[33]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[34]  A. Baddeley Essentials of Human Memory , 1999 .

[35]  E. Stine-Morrow,et al.  Aging and the effects of knowledge on on-line reading strategies. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[36]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[37]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[38]  J. Wiley,et al.  An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[39]  L. Miller The Effects of Real-World Knowledge on Text Processing Among Older Adults , 2001 .

[40]  Stephan Dutke,et al.  Processes of the molar regulation of behavior , 1996 .

[41]  P. Chandler,et al.  When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction , 2003 .

[42]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[43]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations , 1989 .

[44]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[45]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[46]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Discourse comprehension : essays in honor of Walter Kintsch , 1996 .

[47]  Gary J. Anglin,et al.  On Empirically Validating Functions of Pictures in Prose , 1987 .

[48]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The control of short-term memory. , 1971, Scientific American.

[49]  Johann Amos Comenius Orbis sensualium pictus , 1942 .

[50]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Prevalence, function, and structure of Photographs in high school biology textbooks , 2003 .

[51]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[52]  Russell N. Carney,et al.  Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text , 2002 .

[53]  S. Takahashi Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. , 1995, Psychology Review.